1990
DOI: 10.1049/ip-d.1990.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive chattering alleviation of variable structure systems control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chattering phenomenon of a control input should be avoided in real applications; therefore the boundary layer technique is popularly used for this purpose (Slotine 1984, Chang et al 1990). Although the boundary layer technique transforms the chattering control input to a continuous control input, a steady-state error can remain around the sliding line, and the robustness can no longer be guaranteed.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chattering phenomenon of a control input should be avoided in real applications; therefore the boundary layer technique is popularly used for this purpose (Slotine 1984, Chang et al 1990). Although the boundary layer technique transforms the chattering control input to a continuous control input, a steady-state error can remain around the sliding line, and the robustness can no longer be guaranteed.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since chattering is generally undesirable, because it involves extremely high control activity and may excite high-frequency dynamics neglected in modelling, many approaches have been reported to alleviate the chattering phenomenon (Slotine 1984, Chang et al 1990). The so-called boundary layer approach has been popularly used as one solution to alleviate the chattering problem of the control input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the sliding mode control enjoys robustness, it has a significant drawback known as chattering. Chattering is the high frequency bang-bang type of control actions that may produce premature wear or even breakdown [17] the main obstacle to its implementation was chattering. Chattering is caused due to the fast dynamics which are usually neglected in the ideal model or the use of digital controllers with finite sampling rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in order to establish a sliding mode, the sliding mode control suffers from the chattering caused by the high speed switching of the controller output. The undesirable chattering may excite the high frequency system response [3,7] and result in unpredictable instabilities. Further, most of the uncertain systems with the traditional sliding mode control techniques require that the uncertainties satisfy the matching conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%