2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive changes in foot placement for split-belt treadmill walking in individuals with stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All symmetry ratios were converted to standardized mean differences (Hedge's g). Data from 4 studies 8,10,15,22 were obtained from the original research articles, whereas data from 6 studies 7,9,11,[16][17][18] were obtained from the authors through electronic correspondence. Data from 7 studies [12][13][14][23][24][25][26] were not obtained after reaching out to the corresponding authors.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All symmetry ratios were converted to standardized mean differences (Hedge's g). Data from 4 studies 8,10,15,22 were obtained from the original research articles, whereas data from 6 studies 7,9,11,[16][17][18] were obtained from the authors through electronic correspondence. Data from 7 studies [12][13][14][23][24][25][26] were not obtained after reaching out to the corresponding authors.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty of the studies used a 2:1 ratio for speed differences between the 2 belts during the split-belt paradigm. Out of these 20 studies, 9 calculated the fast belt speed as the fastest comfortable walking speed and the slow belt speed as half of that speed, 7,9,11,13,16,[23][24][25][26] 6 calculated the slow belt speed as the participant's self-selected speed and the fast belt as twice the self-selected speed, 8,10,22,27,28,30 3 studies had the fast belt move at 1.0 m/s and the slow belt move at 0.5 m/s, 12,14,17 and 2 studies calculated each participant's self-selected speed and the fast belt was 133% of that speed and the slow belt was 66% of that speed. 18,29 One study 25 had a group complete the training at 3 different speed ratios, 1.5:1, 2:1, and 2.5:1.…”
Section: Belt Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations