Adaptive Capacity: Tensions across Scales

Abstract

Climate variability and climate change impacts on hydrological conditions prescribe the need to better understand favourable conditions for developing and mobilising adaptive capacity. This paper presents new cases to the body of evidence on adaptive capacity in the context of institutional arrangements for water management. It aims to contribute insights into the challenges of developing approaches across governance scales for dealing with climate variability and climate change impacts. The different case studies explored in this article represent an exploration of the challenges across temporal and spatial scales in relation to the adaptive capacity of water governance to hydro-climatic stresses. The studies use a suite of governance related indicators to explore adaptive capacity in relation to past extreme hydrological events. Analysis is based on qualitative open ended interviews and questionnaires. Results indicate that tensions persist in developing proactive capacity and mobilising reactive capacity at different scales of governance to different scales of change. Findings support the increasing recognition in the literature for top down and bottom up approaches to be better balanced in efforts to improve resilience to climate variability and change. Copyright

Adaptive capacity: from assessment to action in coastal social-ecological systems

“…Adaptive capacity can be assessed at different interacting spatial scales using a range of scale-appropriate measures in either ecological or social systems (Adger et al 2005a, Hill andEngle 2013; Fig. 1).…”

“…Along with vulnerability analysis, assessments of adaptive capacity are often used to provide the basis for planning adaptations or management actions to mitigate impacts in efforts to achieve beneficial social or ecological outcomes (McClanahan et al 2008, Hill and Engle 2013. These assessments tend to draw either from theories of ecological resilience (Holling 1973) or social resilience (Adger 2000, , Engle 2011.…”

Alpine aquatic ecosystem conservation policy in a changing climate

“…5), but will be susceptible to other anthropogenic stressors. In the Swiss case, the federal flood policy has prioritised enhancing ecological resilience (Table 2) but considerable challenges remain in stakeholder buy-in during its implementation, strongly related to barriers of purchasing land from farmers or compensation payments for flooded farmland (Hill and Engle, 2013). Managing diverse stakeholder interests and rivalries (e.g.…”

Interdisciplinary approaches for analysing governance challenges across the Rhône basin

“…Major questions relate to whether the governance framework of the Rhône is adequately adaptable to cope with current and future stresses; what are the current tensions in the governance framework at different scales; what are the existing major challenges in relation to a disconnect between ecological and institutional boundaries; whether or not an integrative and adaptive approach is possible in a transboundary context without a framework agreement in place (Adger et al 2009;Bréthaut and Pflieger 2013;Hill and Engle 2013;Lebel et al 2010;Pahl-Wostl et al 2008). …”