2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2021.100761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive capacity for climate change: Local initiatives and federal planning. The case of Tiksi, Sakha Republic, Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also growing consensus that transparent, actionable, and equitable adaptation planning requires inclusivity [121], engagement of diverse stakeholders, especially vulnerable groups, and integration of scientific and community knowledge [122], including traditional and indigenous knowledge in the process of climate service co-production [123,124]. In this study, we examine the participation of nine (9) types of stakeholders, directly and indirectly, in the co-production of information used in vulnerability assessment and the co-development of local climate adaptation plans.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of Equity and Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also growing consensus that transparent, actionable, and equitable adaptation planning requires inclusivity [121], engagement of diverse stakeholders, especially vulnerable groups, and integration of scientific and community knowledge [122], including traditional and indigenous knowledge in the process of climate service co-production [123,124]. In this study, we examine the participation of nine (9) types of stakeholders, directly and indirectly, in the co-production of information used in vulnerability assessment and the co-development of local climate adaptation plans.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of Equity and Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also growing consensus that transparent, actionable, and equitable adaptation planning requires inclusivity [120], engagement of diverse stakeholders, especially vulnerable groups, and integration of scientific and community knowledge [121], including traditional and indigenous knowledge in the process of climate service co-production [122], [123]. In this study, we examine participation of nine ( 9) types of stakeholders, directly and indirectly, in coproduction of information used in vulnerability assessment and co-development of local climate adaptation plans.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%