2007
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2007.4285360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive cancellation method for geometry-induced nonstationary bistatic clutter environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precisely, a set of training data, sharing identical or correlated statistical properties with the noise in the test data, is needed to estimate R. The training data are often collected from range gates in the vicinity of the cell under test [23]. Remarkably, in some situations there may be no sufficient training data, due to environmental and instrumental factors; refer to [25] for details. To overcome this difficulty, many approaches can be adopted, such as frequency agility [26], knowledge-aided methods [27], and low-rank assumption about the noise covariance matrix [28].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precisely, a set of training data, sharing identical or correlated statistical properties with the noise in the test data, is needed to estimate R. The training data are often collected from range gates in the vicinity of the cell under test [23]. Remarkably, in some situations there may be no sufficient training data, due to environmental and instrumental factors; refer to [25] for details. To overcome this difficulty, many approaches can be adopted, such as frequency agility [26], knowledge-aided methods [27], and low-rank assumption about the noise covariance matrix [28].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in Appendix C that when L is large enough both the GLRGDD and AMGDD approach the GLRT with known R in (25), which is denoted as the optimum matched generalized direction detector (OMGDD). For clarity, it is repeated in the following…”
Section: Asymptotic Forms Of the Glrgdd And Amgddmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve target detection performance in the range-dependent clutter circumstance, many approaches have been proposed to compensate clutter range dependency for STAP [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The class of parametric methods includes the Doppler warping (DW) [4], the angle Doppler compensation (ADC) [5], the adaptive angle Doppler compensation (A 2 DC) [6], the high-order Doppler warping (HODW) [7] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in the case of range ambiguity, there exist multiple clutter ridges in a single range bin and it is impossible to compensate all clutter ridges simultaneously. Hence, clutter suppression performance obtained by these approaches [4][5][6][7] is degraded in this case. The class of non-parametric methods is introduced in [8][9][10][11] to deal with range-dependent clutter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Doppler warping (DW) [4] and high-order DW [5] methods apply a (multiple) deterministic pulse domain taper(s) to align the training samples. The angle-Doppler compensation method [6][7][8][9] employs a similar principle to align the peaks of the clutter spectrum of the samples to that of the cell under test (CUT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%