2009 IEEE Workshop on Robotic Intelligence in Informationally Structured Space 2009
DOI: 10.1109/riiss.2009.4937904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive boundary-following algorithm guided by artificial potential field for robot navigation

Abstract: We propose a novel boundary-following algorithm that works in conjunction with any potential function that is guaranteed to take the robot to the target. The potential field must not have any local minima but is not required to avoid moving too closely to the boundary. The proposed method has several advantages: a) The calculation of the C-space is avoided, which can be costly especially if the robot has the ability of rotation; b) the safety distance, which is the distance from the robot to the closest obstac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The past literature on wall-following robots is vast, however we can immediately distinguish this work from potential-field approaches [17], [18], which need a priori knowledge about the environment, as well as from approaches based on mapping [19], [20], which require more sophisticated sensors than assumed here and need relatively high computational power and memory. We want to restrict attention to the so-called "reactive" or "feedback" [21] paradigm of robot control, where the task is specified as a dynamical relation instead of a prescribed plan.…”
Section: A Brief Survey Of Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past literature on wall-following robots is vast, however we can immediately distinguish this work from potential-field approaches [17], [18], which need a priori knowledge about the environment, as well as from approaches based on mapping [19], [20], which require more sophisticated sensors than assumed here and need relatively high computational power and memory. We want to restrict attention to the so-called "reactive" or "feedback" [21] paradigm of robot control, where the task is specified as a dynamical relation instead of a prescribed plan.…”
Section: A Brief Survey Of Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22, does not have a smooth variation outside the target region. In [23], we proposed the Harmonic Field with Optimized Boundary Conditions (HFOBC) combined with Boundary Following Algorithm (BFA) [24]. The HFOBC abandons the uniformity of boundary conditions used in the regular harmonic field, Eq.…”
Section: − →mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary following has also been investigated in robotics, but the models considered in this field are generally deterministic and are therefore less adequate for describing animal behavior (see Ref. [38] and references therein). Therefore, rather than by the boundary-following literature, our approach is inspired by models used for studying bacteria, cells, or animals moving up a stimulus gradient (e.g., a chemical gradient for Escherichia coli bacteria [39], the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum and leukocytes [40,41], an electrical gradient for kertinocytes involved in wound healing [42], or a prey gradient in prey-predator models for some protozoa [43]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%