2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.04.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive biogeography based predator–prey optimization technique for optimal power flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the results are compared with other methods, and the comparison is shown in Table 9. According to the value of the weighted sum, IKHA is better than KHA, particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm (PSOGSA) [29], The proposed KHA [39], adaptive biogeography based predator-prey optimization (ABPPO) [40], MSA [22], LTLBO [23], Gbest guided artificial bee colony algorithm (GABC) [24] and ICBO [12] Looking at the two goals separately, the results of IKHA are lower than those of KHA and the proposed KHA For the results of the other methods in Table 8, such as the PSOGSA [29], only one of the two goals is better than IKHA. As the individual evaluation criteria are different, the optimal solution is different.…”
Section: Case 5: Minimization Of Quadratic Cost and Voltage Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the results are compared with other methods, and the comparison is shown in Table 9. According to the value of the weighted sum, IKHA is better than KHA, particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm (PSOGSA) [29], The proposed KHA [39], adaptive biogeography based predator-prey optimization (ABPPO) [40], MSA [22], LTLBO [23], Gbest guided artificial bee colony algorithm (GABC) [24] and ICBO [12] Looking at the two goals separately, the results of IKHA are lower than those of KHA and the proposed KHA For the results of the other methods in Table 8, such as the PSOGSA [29], only one of the two goals is better than IKHA. As the individual evaluation criteria are different, the optimal solution is different.…”
Section: Case 5: Minimization Of Quadratic Cost and Voltage Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also shows 7.3266% increase in the quadratic fuel cost and 49.661% reduction in the transmission real power losses compared with case 1. The simulation results are compared with other methods in Table 10, and the value of the weighted sum is better than KHA, MSA [22], modified differential evolution (MDE) [22], PSOGSA [29] and ABPPO [40]. The analysis of current case is similar to Case 5 because that the different criteria make different choices.…”
Section: Case 6: Minimization Of Quadratic Cost and Transmission Realmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newly developed search-based optimization algorithms are applied for OPF problems, like particle swarm optimization (PSO) method sit [ 2 ], differential evolutionary technique sit [ 20 ] [ 21 ]), improved colliding bodies optimization method sit [ 22 ], improved PSO algorithm sit [ 23 ], biogeography-based optimization technique sit [ 24 ], imperialist competitive method sit [ 25 ], grey wolf optimizer sit [ 26 ], hybrid algorithm of PSO and GSA algorithm sit [ 27 ], differential search technique sit [ 28 ], gravitational search method (GSM) sit [ 29 ] [ 30 ] [ 31 ], multi-phase search optimization technique sit [ 32 ] [ 33 ], fuzzy-based hybrid PSO algorithm sit [ 34 ], chaotic self-adaptive differential harmony search method sit [ 35 ], black-hole-based optimization technique sit [ 36 ], harmony search technique sit [ 37 ], artificial bee colony method (4), Jaya optimization technique sit [ 38 ], teaching-learning-optimization algorithm sit [ 39 ], biogeography-based optimization (BBO) sit [ 40 ], differential evolution (DE) sit [ 41 ], artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm sit [ 42 ], distributed algorithm (DA) sit [ 43 ], and the Firefly algorithm (FA) sit [ 44 ]. An analysis of a non-deterministic algorithm, which is applied to solve OPF, is mentioned in sit [ 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BBO is an evolutionary algorithm that was inspired by the migration of species between habitats. Specifically, it was inspired by biogeography, which describes (i) the speciation and migration of species between isolated habitats and (ii) the extinction of species [29]. In recent years, the BBO algorithm has been widely used in a myriad of fields, such as to solve the engineering optimization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%