2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00745.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive beam search lookahead algorithms for the circular packing problem

Abstract: This paper addresses the circular packing problem (CPP), which consists in packing n circles C i , each of known radius r i , iAN 5 f1, . . ., ng, into the smallest containing circle C. The objective is to determine the radius r of C as well as the coordinates (x i , y i ) of the center of C i , iAN. CPP is solved using two adaptive algorithms that adopt a binary search to determine r, and a beam search to check the feasibility of packing n circles into C when the radius is fixed at r. A node of level ', ' 5 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COP requests each current packing circle contact with two packed circles or the boundary of the container and does not overlap with other circles, and the MHD function can measure the quality of the candidate action of the circle placement. There are several follow-up works based on COP heuristic and MHD function to either solve other variants or improve the algorithm efficiency: Huang, Li, Akeb and Li (2005) adopt this heuristic for packing circles in a rectangular container; Lü and Huang (2008) apply a Pruned-Enriched-Rosenbluth Method (PERM) to improve the performance on the unequal circle packing problem; Akeb, Hifi and M'Hallah (2009); Akeb, Hifi and M'Hallah (2010) further employ the beam search and adaptive beam search algorithms to improve the performance on unequal circle packing problems, and Chen, Tang, Song, Zeng, Peng and Liu (2018) present a greedy heuristic algorithm for solving the PECC problem. There also exist other circle placement heuristics for solving the packing problems, such as Bottom-Left-Fill (Martello, Monaci and Vigo, 2003;Burke, Hellier, Kendall andWhitwell, 2006) andBest Local Position (Hifi andM'Hallah, 2004;Hifi and M'Hallah, 2007).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COP requests each current packing circle contact with two packed circles or the boundary of the container and does not overlap with other circles, and the MHD function can measure the quality of the candidate action of the circle placement. There are several follow-up works based on COP heuristic and MHD function to either solve other variants or improve the algorithm efficiency: Huang, Li, Akeb and Li (2005) adopt this heuristic for packing circles in a rectangular container; Lü and Huang (2008) apply a Pruned-Enriched-Rosenbluth Method (PERM) to improve the performance on the unequal circle packing problem; Akeb, Hifi and M'Hallah (2009); Akeb, Hifi and M'Hallah (2010) further employ the beam search and adaptive beam search algorithms to improve the performance on unequal circle packing problems, and Chen, Tang, Song, Zeng, Peng and Liu (2018) present a greedy heuristic algorithm for solving the PECC problem. There also exist other circle placement heuristics for solving the packing problems, such as Bottom-Left-Fill (Martello, Monaci and Vigo, 2003;Burke, Hellier, Kendall andWhitwell, 2006) andBest Local Position (Hifi andM'Hallah, 2004;Hifi and M'Hallah, 2007).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, some heuristic methods are generally proposed to solve it. For the circular packing problem in a rectangular container, the solving algorithms include the heuristic tabu search algorithm [1], the heuristic algorithm based on bounded enumeration strategy for evaluating corner placement [2], et al For the problem of packing circles into a larger circular container, some authors have developed various heuristic algorithms to generate approximate solutions, including the quasi-physical quasi-human algorithm [3][4][5], the complete quasi-physical algorithm [6], the Pruned-Enriched Rosenbluth Method (PERM) [7], the dynamic adaptive local search algorithm [8], the simulated annealing (SA) [9] and its improved algorithms [10,11], the beam search algorithm [12] and the adaptive beam search algorithm [13], the energy landscape paving (ELP) method [14,15], the global optimization algorithm based on the quasi-physical method [16], and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%