2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive automation and human factors in manufacturing: An experimental assessment for a cognitive approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automation surprises as identified in the manufacturing industry [106] have a longer research legacy in healthcare and aviation. In some noticeable examples of these domains [107,108], automation surprises have caused or contributed to tragic catastrophes [109][110][111].…”
Section: Autonomy and Automation In Joint Human-agent Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Automation surprises as identified in the manufacturing industry [106] have a longer research legacy in healthcare and aviation. In some noticeable examples of these domains [107,108], automation surprises have caused or contributed to tragic catastrophes [109][110][111].…”
Section: Autonomy and Automation In Joint Human-agent Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automation interaction challenges in manufacturing list the same set of problems as the ones described in aviation accident reports. Mode transition surprises whereby "operators may become unaware of changes in the operating mode performed by automation" [106] (p. 455) are described in manufacturing automation. The same authors describe automation-induced errors, whereby more automation can induce new, unexpected forms of human performance or inappropriate distrust in automation from manufacturing environments.…”
Section: Autonomy and Automation In Joint Human-agent Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Towards a fulfilled HCD of workplaces, not only the physical aspects but also the cognitive ergonomic aspects need to be considered during the design processes. Concerning the cognitive workload related to manufacturing operations at different decisional levels, in [24], a human-in-the-loop framework concerning the design of workplaces was proposed to classify the fabrication tasks of production processes according to their cognitive complexity. In the ergonomic analyses phase, unlike traditional methods, which only observe operators in the actual running workplace, the impact of design plans including human actions and reactions can be simulated and verified by immersed vision based approaches.…”
Section: Human-centered Design For Shop-floor Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different research fields also investigate the modalities and boundary conditions for applying such technology and other originally clinical technology (cf., fNIRS, EEG) on the shop floor and in office environments to monitor employee's mental workload (cf., Young et al, 2014). In Industry 4.0 in particular, such physiological measurement could be integrated in a cyber-physical system allowing, for instance, assistive technology such as augmented reality and assistive robots to immediately adapt to operator MWL (D'Addona et al, 2018). Indeed, as the smart factory is taking shape through integrating advanced manufacturing techniques with digital infrastructures, the effects of the extensive flexibility expected from operators (Longo et al, 2017) on the mental processing could benefit from mental workload optimization as supported by objective MWL-monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%