2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2004.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive anti-spam filtering for agglutinative languages: a special case for Turkish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the performance of ANN and DT classifiers clearly indicates that these methods are suitable for detecting spam e-mails. Moreover, the accuracy rates attained from the ANN method are superior to some other studies in the literature [3], [19]- [21]. Additionally, the extraction of other features, the evaluation of feature selection and classification methods on spam e-mail detection problem can be carried out as an interesting future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the performance of ANN and DT classifiers clearly indicates that these methods are suitable for detecting spam e-mails. Moreover, the accuracy rates attained from the ANN method are superior to some other studies in the literature [3], [19]- [21]. Additionally, the extraction of other features, the evaluation of feature selection and classification methods on spam e-mail detection problem can be carried out as an interesting future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The existing techniques are classified into two categories: Static and dynamic methods [3]. Static methods are based on predefined addresses or header contents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While considering the reports like what is mentioned in [23] that indicates in 1998 about 10% of the incoming emails to a network has been spam, which according to [4] in 2003 has increased up to 24% and has been about 65% in July 2007 [5], it would be revealed that email, as one of the most popular internet services and a realization of the computer networks as a powerful communication medium [29] is confronted with the problem of spam, which causes money, time and bandwidth waste and is a true security issue. Symantec researches has turned up that in 2002, 63% of users have received more than 7 spam a day in contrast to the remaining 37% that have received up to 14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this regard, classification of email is an important and growing task that concluded from the spam email's menace [1,3]. Several spam filtering techniques have been introduced by using machine learning approaches including SVM [4], GA [5], AIS [1,6,7], case based technique [8] and ANN [9] to combat spam messages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%