2016
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive and neutral markers both show continent‐wide population structure of mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae)

Abstract: Assessments of population genetic structure and demographic history have traditionally been based on neutral markers while explicitly excluding adaptive markers. In this study, we compared the utility of putatively adaptive and neutral single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for inferring mountain pine beetle population structure across its geographic range. Both adaptive and neutral SNPs, and their combination, allowed range‐wide structure to be distinguished and delimited a population that has recently underg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(113 reference statements)
11
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When filtered for HWE and LD (i.e., FF dataset), PCA results support a north-south geographic division among the sampling locations (Figure 2a), in agreement with prior studies (e.g., Samarasekera et al, 2012;Janes et al, 2014;Batista et al, 2016;Trevoy et al, 2018). As demonstrated in Trevoy et al (2018) (Bleiker, Heron, Braithwaite, & Smith, 2013;Janes et al, 2016).…”
Section: Population Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When filtered for HWE and LD (i.e., FF dataset), PCA results support a north-south geographic division among the sampling locations (Figure 2a), in agreement with prior studies (e.g., Samarasekera et al, 2012;Janes et al, 2014;Batista et al, 2016;Trevoy et al, 2018). As demonstrated in Trevoy et al (2018) (Bleiker, Heron, Braithwaite, & Smith, 2013;Janes et al, 2016).…”
Section: Population Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These methods are not consistently applied, however, and filtering is evaluated on a case‐by‐case basis depending on research needs and study species (Arnold, Corbet‐Detig, Hartl, & Bomblies, ; Narum, Buerkle, Davey, Miller, & Hohenlohe, ). Although neutral markers are useful for investigations of genetic drift and gene flow, recent work has called into question the value of removing non‐neutral markers in SNP assays (Batista, Janes, Boone, Murray, & Sperling, ; Helyar et al, ). Likewise, filtering out repetitive markers in SNP datasets may prevent useful genetic signal from being overwhelmed by a few linked markers, but can hinder the reconciliation of genetic differentiation with genomic architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because genetic diversity estimates are sensitive to the number of genetic markers (Dutoit, Burri, Nater, Mugal, & Ellegren, 2017), such a low number of outlier loci is insufficient to calculate robust genetic diversity estimates of non-neutral diversity. Furthermore, to effectively compare neutral and non-neutral loci patterns, an equal number of both types of loci should ideally be used (Batista et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%