2010 International Conference on Network and Service Management 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cnsm.2010.5691214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive admission control of distributed cloud services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Leontiou et al [28] propose an adaptive feedback scheme with an application queue model to prevent overload of cloud services. Kjaer et al [29] use an online feed-forward control system for web server resource allocation avoiding performance disturbances rejecting individual requests.…”
Section: Admission Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Leontiou et al [28] propose an adaptive feedback scheme with an application queue model to prevent overload of cloud services. Kjaer et al [29] use an online feed-forward control system for web server resource allocation avoiding performance disturbances rejecting individual requests.…”
Section: Admission Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It used Lyapunov Optimization to design an online admission control, routing, and resource allocation algorithm for a virtualized data center. In [11], an adaptive feedback control scheme alongside with a queue model of the application was employed. Cloud service, modeled using queuing theory, and controlled through adaptive proactive controllers that estimate whether services need some of the resources in the near future or not, was discussed in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We subsequently removed all problem models with a load > 3. In these cases, it would be preferable to filter applications using admission policies, such as those described in [37], in the management system, ensuring some applications are not accepted by the system.…”
Section: Load-based Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%