Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services 2014
DOI: 10.4108/icst.mobicase.2014.257787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Activity Recognition with Dynamic Heterogeneous Sensor Fusion

Abstract: In spite of extensive research in the last decade, activity recognition still faces many challenges for real-world applications. On one hand, when attempting to recognize various activities, different sensors play different on different activity classes. This heterogeneity raises the necessity of learning the optimal combination of sensor modalities for each activity. On the other hand, users may consistently or occasionally annotate activities. To boost recognition accuracy, we need to incorporate the user in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next step is to select the optimal set of features using feature selection methods such as windowing technique, kernel discriminant analysis [122], minimal redundancy maximal relevance heuristic [126], Correlation based Feature Selection [125,121]. Afterwards, the selected features are fed into supervised classifiers including Naive Bayes [122], SVM [124,126], Decision Trees [121], Neural Networks [15], k-Nearest Neighbor [125] or unsupervised clustering methods such as LDA, MFA [127] depending on the availability of the labels for each class of activity to detect the activities including static physical activities like sitting, standing, lying, watching TV [122,15], and dynamic like walking and up stairs [122], down stairs, running [125], ramp up and down [121]. Table 6 summarizes our analysis of the literature on feature-level sensor fusion in activity recognition systems; for the sake of clarity, we reported only the most representative (in terms of citations and novelty) analyzed works.…”
Section: Feature-level Fusion In Activity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next step is to select the optimal set of features using feature selection methods such as windowing technique, kernel discriminant analysis [122], minimal redundancy maximal relevance heuristic [126], Correlation based Feature Selection [125,121]. Afterwards, the selected features are fed into supervised classifiers including Naive Bayes [122], SVM [124,126], Decision Trees [121], Neural Networks [15], k-Nearest Neighbor [125] or unsupervised clustering methods such as LDA, MFA [127] depending on the availability of the labels for each class of activity to detect the activities including static physical activities like sitting, standing, lying, watching TV [122,15], and dynamic like walking and up stairs [122], down stairs, running [125], ramp up and down [121]. Table 6 summarizes our analysis of the literature on feature-level sensor fusion in activity recognition systems; for the sake of clarity, we reported only the most representative (in terms of citations and novelty) analyzed works.…”
Section: Feature-level Fusion In Activity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of mobile, wearable, and pervasive computing, extensive research has been conducted to recognize human activities [2,4,7,8,[23][24][25][31][32][33][34][35]. One line of research in this field starts with Bao et al [2], who placed accelerometers on different body positions to recognize daily activities such as "walking," "sitting," and "watching TV."…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few examples which introduce Fisher into data fusion are as follows. Zeng et al [20] proposed a sensor fusion framework based adaptive activity recognition and dynamic heterogeneous, and they incorporated it into popular feature transformation algorithms, e.g., marginal Fisher's analysis, and maximum mutual information in the proposed framework. Chen et al [21] introduced the finite mixture of Von Mises-Fisher (VMF) distribution for observations that are invariant to actions of a spherical symmetry group.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%