1971
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(71)90055-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaption of Koiter's method to finite element analysis of snap-through buckling behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a circular shallow arch is buckled in snapthrough behaviour, its deformed shape is similar to the buckled shape of a unilaterally restrained arch. Table 1 presents the buckling load coefficients for circular arch suggested by Kerr and Soifer 16 and Haftka et al 17 Sun and Natori 18 proposed the numerical solution of a large deformation problem considering the unilateral boundary condition. Smith et al 19 and Bradford et al 20 showed that the unilateral buckling strength is larger than the bilateral buckling strength for a rectangular plate subjected to the bending, compression and shear.…”
Section: Buckling Condition Of Flat Internal Tubementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When a circular shallow arch is buckled in snapthrough behaviour, its deformed shape is similar to the buckled shape of a unilaterally restrained arch. Table 1 presents the buckling load coefficients for circular arch suggested by Kerr and Soifer 16 and Haftka et al 17 Sun and Natori 18 proposed the numerical solution of a large deformation problem considering the unilateral boundary condition. Smith et al 19 and Bradford et al 20 showed that the unilateral buckling strength is larger than the bilateral buckling strength for a rectangular plate subjected to the bending, compression and shear.…”
Section: Buckling Condition Of Flat Internal Tubementioning
confidence: 98%
“…[16][17][18][19] Kerr and Soifer 16 proposed the buckling strength of a circular arch by linearisation of the prebuckling deformation. Haftka et al 17 suggested the bifurcation buckling strength and snap-through buckling strength of a circular shallow arch using the Koiter's method. When a circular shallow arch is buckled in snapthrough behaviour, its deformed shape is similar to the buckled shape of a unilaterally restrained arch.…”
Section: Buckling Condition Of Flat Internal Tubementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 However, when combining the asymptotic approach with a finite element discretization, many critical loads are involved. 5 Koiter suggested a method of handling nearly coincident critical loads, while Byskov and Hutchinson presented a formulation for well-separated critical loads. 6 It has also been shown experimentally that interaction between well-separated critical loads can occur.…”
Section: An Investigation Into Non-linear Interaction Between Bucklinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kerr and Soifer (1969) proposed a method to determine the buckling strength of a circular arch by linearisation of the prebuckling deformation. Haftka et al (1971) suggested a method to determine the bifurcation buckling strength and snap-through buckling strength of a circular shallow arch using Koiter's method. Sun and Natori (1996) proposed a numerical solution for a large-deformation problem by considering the unilateral boundary condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%