Adaption, implementation and evaluation of collaborative service improvements in the testing and result communication process in primary care from patient and staff perspectives: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundIncreasing numbers of blood tests are being ordered in primary care settings and the swift and accurate communication of test results is central to providing high quality care. The process of testing and result communication is complex and reliant on the coordinated actions of care providers, external groups in laboratory and hospital settings, and patients. This fragmentation leaves it vulnerable to error and the need to improve an apparently fallible system is apparent. However, primary care is complex and does not necessarily adopt change in a linear and prescribed manner influenced by a range of factors relating to practice staff, patients and organisational factors. To account for these competing perspectives, we worked in conjunction with both staff and patients to develop and implement strategies intended to improve patient satisfaction and increase efficiency of existing processes.MethodsThe study applied the principles of ‘experience-based co-design’ to identify key areas of weakness and source proposals for change from staff and patients. The study was undertaken within two primary practices situated in South Birmingham (UK) of contrasting size and socio-economic environment. Senior practice staff were involved in the refinement of the interventions for introduction. We conducted focus groups singly constituted of staff and patients at each practice to determine suitability, applicability and desirability alongside the practical implications of their introduction.ResultsAt each practice four of the six proposals for change were implemented these were increased access to phlebotomy, improved receptionist training, proactive communication of results, and increased patient awareness of the tests ordered and the means of their communication. All were received favourably by both patients and staff. The remaining issues around the management of telephone calls and the introduction of electronic alerts for missing results were not addressed due to constraints of time and available resources.ConclusionsApproaches to tackling the same area of weakness differed at practices and was determined by individual staff attitudes and by organisational and patient characteristics. The long-term impact of the changes requires further quantitative evaluation.

Quality improvements of safety-netting guidelines for cancer in UK primary care: insights from a qualitative interview study of GPs

“…26 A service co-design project sought to address these weaknesses and, although able to make some changes that were well received by patients and staff, time and resource constraints limited its impact. 27 Ensuring that a robust and fit-forpurpose system is in place is vital given the increasing number of test results handled in primary care. 28 Implications for research and practice Study participants' views on which of the guidelines are helpful, their current implementation status, and suggested facilitators for further implementation (Box 2), together, help to prioritise future research in this area.…”

Psychiatrists’ Attitude to the Psychiatrist’s Style of Dressing and Addressing: A Cross -Sectional Study

“…The male psychiatric clothes included t-shirts and trousers (1), medical white coats (2), suits (3), as well as shirts and trousers (4). Female psychiatrist's cloths included (1) colored mantos and scarves (1), black headdresses and white medical coats (2), black veils (3), and black head dresses and mantos (4). The same face was used for all photographs.…”

“…During the earliest consultation a patient will develop a first impression of the physician through a verbal and nonverbal communication. Professional presentation of a physician, proficiency and caring about confidentiality issues all contribute to create a right link between a physician and a patient (2,4). While the physician starts to build up trust, patient's impression is going to grow as well.…”

“…While the physician starts to build up trust, patient's impression is going to grow as well. In fact, a mutual communication is necessary to enhance the patient's acceptance to treatment [3,4].…”

Patient facing decision support system for interpretation of laboratory test results

“…Studies [ 12 – 15 ] have demonstrated that many providers do not have systems that can ensure that the test results are reliably communicated to patients. As shown in [ 16 , 17 ] normal and abnormal test results are commonly missed, even when a health care system widely uses electronic health records (EHRs), and providers miss 1–10% of abnormal test results.…”