2019
DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project

Abstract: The Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda recognise the role of cities in achieving sustainable development. However, these agendas were agreed and signed by national governments and thus implementing them at the local level requires a process of adaptation or localisation. In this paper, we analyse five aspects that practitioners and researchers need to consider when localising them: (1) delimitation of the urban boundary; (2) integrated governance; (3) actors; (4) synergies and trade-offs an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
128
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In doing so, the resilience strategies that have been produced through these assessments represent a potentially useful tool in implementing multiple development agendas that have resilience at their core while building coherence among these different agendas by integrating and institutionalizing resilience in wider city planning and practice. This is important because, while cities are acknowledged as crucial actors in the implementation of global development goals and agendas, most of them have been designed by and for national governments, posing a range of challenges for their planning, monitoring, and implementation at the local level [9,10]. Their implementation therefore requires a process of "localization" or the process of adapting, implementing, and monitoring SDGs at the local level [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, the resilience strategies that have been produced through these assessments represent a potentially useful tool in implementing multiple development agendas that have resilience at their core while building coherence among these different agendas by integrating and institutionalizing resilience in wider city planning and practice. This is important because, while cities are acknowledged as crucial actors in the implementation of global development goals and agendas, most of them have been designed by and for national governments, posing a range of challenges for their planning, monitoring, and implementation at the local level [9,10]. Their implementation therefore requires a process of "localization" or the process of adapting, implementing, and monitoring SDGs at the local level [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, the adaptation of the SDGs to the urban context will require the participation of relevant stakeholders from multiple sectors [57]. The implementation of the SDGs in cities may highlight synergistic relationships among the goals that could provide efficient policy pathways towards the achievement of the SDGs in the urban context [58]. The relationship between household size and food security in this study suggests that food insecurity increases at an increasing rate for each additional household member.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As we argue by presenting our coded database of official UN texts, we should not underplay the extensive advocacy, hallway diplomacy and non‐governmental efforts that have gone into making the global ‘case’ for cities concrete in major UN frameworks like the Paris Agreement. Yet often the resulting multilateral documents, such the New Urban Agenda (NUA) or even the SDGs, have been criticised by many due to their attempts to clarify the normative and operational goals that had been left unspecified in the SDGs (Garschagen et al, ; Parnell, ; Valencia et al, ). Numerous commentaries point already at key challenges to the implementation of the urban dimension of the SDGs and even more so of the NUA, flagging shortcomings in the use and availability of indicators and timings for the evaluation process, limits in funding and many unanswered questions as to the role of cities in UN programmes (Barnett and Parnell, ; Caprotti et al, ; Klopp and Petretta, ; Acuto et al, ).…”
Section: Cities and The United Nationsmentioning
confidence: 99%