2021
DOI: 10.1002/humu.24280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting the ACMG/AMP variant classification framework: A perspective from the ClinGen Hemoglobinopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel

Abstract: Accurate and consistent interpretation of sequence variants is integral to the delivery of safe and reliable diagnostic genetic services. To standardize the interpretation process, in 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) published a joint guideline based on a set of shared standards for the classification of variants in Mendelian diseases. The generality of these standards and their subjective interpretation between laboratories ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2015 was published what would become the international standard for DNA variants' classification, the ACMG/AMP guidelines [13]. These guidelines were meant to be applied to many different genes and conditions, and since then are being continually discussed and adapted [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015 was published what would become the international standard for DNA variants' classification, the ACMG/AMP guidelines [13]. These guidelines were meant to be applied to many different genes and conditions, and since then are being continually discussed and adapted [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we have used REVEL, which predict the pathogenicity of missense changes based on a combination of scores from 13 individual tools (Ioannidis et al 2016). The REVEL score can range from 0 to 1 and is recommended by CLINGEN consortium (https://www.clinicalgenome.org/) as a standalone meta-predictor for variant assessment (Kountouris et al 2021). The c.1464T>G p.(Cys488Trp) reached a significantly high score of 0.833; in general, a score >0.75 is considered evidence of pathogenicity.…”
Section: Variant Reassessment and Reclassificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When should a pathologically relevant mutation be considered to be a "risk" variant rather than being "pathogenic" in its own right? Various adaptations and refinements of the ACMG guidelines have previously been made in the context of secondary findings derived from clinical exome and genome sequencing [4] as well as in the context of different genes/diseases [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] or specific variant types [15]. In addition, a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG variant classification criteria in terms of 40,000 clinically observed variants has also been made [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%