2022
DOI: 10.1111/tct.13453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting for sustainability: Ensuring provision of research skills development for undergraduate medical students

Abstract: Background: The Covid-19 pandemic forced undergraduate medical students and staff to adapt and adjust to new strategies for conducting research. The aim of this study was to investigate its impact on student research opportunities across Irish and UK medical schools and how these programmes have responded, both in terms of innovation and practical solutions.Methods: A 17-item online mixed methods survey was distributed to academic staff across 31 Irish and UK medical schools. Participants were asked about (a) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst all project types were affected by delays and downsizing, those most affected were retrospective clinical audits (91%), due to reduced access the hospital medical records required and especially where the project supervisor was a frontline healthcare professional treating and caring for patients with COVID-19. As reported by others, there was a general lack of staff and student preparedness for the abrupt transition to remote learning [ 7 , 8 ] with research work and project-based learning being particularly affected [ 5 , 9 ]. Laboratory-based projects were halted during lockdown periods and were vulnerable to the transport delays caused by the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst all project types were affected by delays and downsizing, those most affected were retrospective clinical audits (91%), due to reduced access the hospital medical records required and especially where the project supervisor was a frontline healthcare professional treating and caring for patients with COVID-19. As reported by others, there was a general lack of staff and student preparedness for the abrupt transition to remote learning [ 7 , 8 ] with research work and project-based learning being particularly affected [ 5 , 9 ]. Laboratory-based projects were halted during lockdown periods and were vulnerable to the transport delays caused by the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Added to this were significant delays in Ethics Committee review and approval [ 6 ] due to the large number of research projects needing revision. Furthermore, the project supervisor pool was significantly impacted, with many supervisors bearing increased clinical and academic workloads [ 7 ], whilst others were affected by the travel restrictions. In response to these challenges, it was necessary for the MD Project team to respond and oversee the rescope of many MD Projects in a short timeframe, so that the learning objectives of the MD Project Program were not compromised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New educational approaches, such as telemedicine, have emerged as a result of the necessity to identify new strategies to facilitate interaction between students and patients [ 31 ]. Moreover, most universities had to interrupt typical clinical scientific studies and restrict access to laboratory research environments due to infection control efforts [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to over 75% of respondents, COVID-19 has a negative impact on the availability of clinical research, lab-based research, and summer research programs. The authors enhanced some novel strategies such as adaptation and adjustment in research project design, relocation to online platforms, research dissemination in the virtual environment, increased workload for research program delivery staff, flexibility around assessment of research-based assignments, and value of open communication [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation