2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting Biased Gene Conversion theory to account for intensive GC-content deterioration in the human genome by novel mutations

Abstract: We examined seventy million well-characterized human mutations, and their impact on G +C-compositional dynamics, in order to understand the formation and maintenance of major genomic nucleotide sequence patterns. Among novel mutations, those that change a strong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process, called GC-biased gene conversion is quite prevalent in metazoans ( Duret and Galtier, 2009 ). It has been estimated that each generation the average human genome gains roughly 100 de novo single nucleotide mutations ( Chintalapati and Moorjani, 2020 ), and experiences 13 GC-biased gene conversion events ( Paudel et al, 2020 ). When one considers that at most only 10% of all mutations occur in functional parts of the genome ( Lindblad-Toh et al, 2011 ; Ward and Kellis, 2012 ; Rands et al, 2014 ; Graur, 2017 ), GC-biased gene conversion has at least as much influence over genomic content as selection, and this has been observed in the human genome ( Pouyet et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Mutational Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process, called GC-biased gene conversion is quite prevalent in metazoans ( Duret and Galtier, 2009 ). It has been estimated that each generation the average human genome gains roughly 100 de novo single nucleotide mutations ( Chintalapati and Moorjani, 2020 ), and experiences 13 GC-biased gene conversion events ( Paudel et al, 2020 ). When one considers that at most only 10% of all mutations occur in functional parts of the genome ( Lindblad-Toh et al, 2011 ; Ward and Kellis, 2012 ; Rands et al, 2014 ; Graur, 2017 ), GC-biased gene conversion has at least as much influence over genomic content as selection, and this has been observed in the human genome ( Pouyet et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Mutational Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the relative frequency of the SNPs in the first bin (0–1%) is more than 20 times larger than the rest of the bins, the first bin was excluded from Figure 1 in order to remove scale distortion. Figure 1 also does not show the last 50 bins (from 51% to 100%) because these frequent alternative alleles are highly enriched by derived alleles instead of ancestral ones, which causes wrong conclusions (e.g., see Paudel and co-authors [ 15 ]). However, the full set of data for all 100 bins are presented in the Supplementary Table S1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is a significant excess of mutations that convert G–C base pairs into A–T base pairs in the human genome than the reverse; mutations that convert A–T base pairs into G–C. However, there is no deterioration of GC-content in humans because the initial excess of G–C to A–T mutations is compensated by the Biased Gene Conversion that operates on the level of DNA reparation of mismatched base pairs in DNA heteroduplexes [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors also hypothesise that the coexistence of elements with drastically different base compositions suggests that these elements may be using different strategies to persist and multiply in the genome of their host. Similarly, other authors proposed that in addition to gBGC, there may be additional, still uncharacterized molecular mechanisms that either preserve genomic regions with biased nucleotide compositions from mutational degradation or fail to degrade such inhomogeneities in specific chromosomal regions [ 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%