Adapting and Validating a Scale to Measure Sexual Stigma among Lesbian, Bisexual and Queer Women

Abstract

Lesbian, bisexual and queer (LBQ) women experience pervasive sexual stigma that harms wellbeing. Stigma is a multi-dimensional construct and includes perceived stigma, awareness of negative attitudes towards one’s group, and enacted stigma, overt experiences of discrimination. Despite its complexity, sexual stigma research has generally explored singular forms of sexual stigma among LBQ women. The study objective was to develop a scale to assess perceived and enacted sexual stigma among LBQ women. We adapted a sexual stigma scale for use with LBQ women. The validation process involved 3 phases. First, we held a focus group where we engaged a purposively selected group of key informants in cognitive interviewing techniques to modify the survey items to enhance relevance to LBQ women. Second, we implemented an internet-based, cross-sectional survey with LBQ women (n=466) in Toronto, Canada. Third, we administered an internet-based survey at baseline and 6-week follow-up with LBQ women in Toronto (n=24) and Calgary (n=20). We conducted an exploratory factor analysis using principal components analysis and descriptive statistics to explore health and demographic correlates of the sexual stigma scale. Analyses yielded one scale with two factors: perceived and enacted sexual stigma. The total scale and subscales demonstrated adequate internal reliability (total scale alpha coefficient: 0.78; perceived sub-scale: 0.70; enacted sub-scale: 0.72), test-retest reliability, and construct validity. Perceived and enacted sexual stigma were associated with higher rates of depressive symptoms and lower self-esteem, social support, and self-rated health scores. Results suggest this sexual stigma scale adapted for LBQ women has good psychometric properties and addresses enacted and perceived stigma dimensions. The overwhelming majority of participants reported experiences of perceived sexual stigma. This underscores the importance of moving beyond a singular focus on discrimination to explore perceptions of social judgment, negative attitudes and social norms.

Improvement in hospital Quality of Care (QoC) after the introduction of rotavirus vaccination: An evaluation study in Belgium

“…30 In the medical world it has been used to help classifying patient-groups in function of disease severity levels based on scores constructed through the collection of data from questionnaires. 31 Currently, cost-effectiveness analyses of new vaccines have not been able to include any QoC benefits of vaccination. The present analysis offers a way to quantify the QoC benefit, which may allow its potential impact on hospital costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to be incorporated in economic analyses.…”

Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Youths' Public Facilities Use and Psychological Well-Being: A Mixed-Method Study

“…We adapted Logie and Earnshaw's sexual stigma scale to measure frequencies of experienced discrimination, including stereotype, enacted stigma, and harassment. 17 We added two items related to stigma or discrimination experiences in school and public bathrooms, and removed two items that were not relevant for youth. This 12-item scale uses a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (Many times) to 4 (Never).…”

Correlates of clinical breast examination among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer women

“…In validating the sexual stigma scale assessing perceived and enacted sexual stigma among LGBQ women, Logie and Earnshaw reported that most women had not experienced extreme forms of enacted stigma (e.g., being beaten up), while perceived stigma was more pervasive. 26 As perceived GNC stigma was associated with reduced odds of having had a CBE in the past two years, these findings suggest the need for interventions to address the subtle ways that social and health care environments may stigmatize women on the basis of gender presentation. Education of HCP about LGBQ women's lived experiences and health care needs, and GNC stigma, can facilitate competent health care provision.…”

“…Sexual stigma was assessed using the Homophobia Scale, 25 adapted and validated for LBQ women. 26 Sexual stigma subscales had acceptable reliability: perceived sexual stigma (Cronbach's α = 0.70) and enacted sexual stigma (Cronbach's α = 0.73). GNC stigma was measured similarly using an adapted version of the Homophobia Scale and was administered only to participants who considered themselves gender non-conforming (n = 148).…”