Adapting Agricultural Production Systems to Climate Change—What’s the Use of Models?

Abstract

Climate change poses a challenge to agricultural production and its impacts vary depending on regional focus and on the type of production system. To avoid production losses and make use of emerging potentials, adaptations in agricultural management will inevitably be required. Adaptation responses can broadly be distinguished into (1) short-term incremental responses that farmers often choose autonomously in response to observed changes and based on local knowledge and experiences, and (2) long-term transformative responses that require strategic planning, and which are usually implemented at a larger spatial scale. Models can be used to support decision making at both response levels; thereby, different features of models prove more or less valuable depending on the type of adaptation response. This paper presents a systematic literature review on the state-of-the-art in modelling for adaptation planning in agricultural production systems, investigating the question of which model types can be distinguished and how these types differ in the way they support decision making in agricultural adaptation planning. Five types of models are distinguished: (1) empirical crop models; (2) regional suitability models; (3) biophysical models; (4) meta-models; and (5) decision models. The potential and limitations of these model types for providing decision-support to short-and long-term adaptation planning are discussed. The risk of maladaptation-adaptation that implies negative consequences either in the long term or in a wider context-is identified as a key challenge of adaptation planning that needs more attention. Maladaptation is not only a risk of decision making in the face of incomplete knowledge of future climate impacts on the agricultural production system; but it can also be a threat if the connectedness of the agroecosystem is not sufficiently acknowledged when management adaptations are implemented. Future research supporting climate change adaptation efforts should thus be based on integrated assessments of risk and vulnerabilities (considering climate variability and uncertainty). To secure adaptation success in the long term, frameworks for monitoring management adaptations and their consequences should be institutionalised.

Using Ecological Modelling Tools to Inform Policy Makers of Potential Changes in Crop Distribution: An Example with Cacao Crops in Latin America

“…In this chapter, we will discuss the use of SDM in crop science, that is a type of suitability model sensu Holzkämper (2017). The approach might be perceived as biased, but as we will see, it may be flexible enough to forecast potential shifts not only in crops, but in their related pests and diseases as well as invasive species, all of which have economic impacts with relatively small quantities of data.…”

Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Meteorological Elements in the North China District of China during 1960–2015

“…Climate change has a great effect on the water demand of plants and crops, the water consumption, and the grain yield due to increased temperatures and variable rainfall, especially in poor adaptability areas [2,3]. Climate change is expected to increasingly affect crop yields [4][5][6][7][8] and crop water requirements [9]; which impact on the regional and global food security and water security.…”

Global warming impact on confined livestock in buildings: efficacy of adaptation measures to reduce heat stress for growing-fattening pigs

“…All AMs can be divided into groups relative to their costs, complexity, knowledge requirements of the farmers, and the time scale of the implementation (Holzkämper 2017). AMs related to management can be applied for the short term, such as SD60% and SD80% and SHIFT.…”