2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) oral fluid antibody ELISA to routine surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another explanation could be that the positive ELISA results of the samples taken at week 11 in batch 2 represented false positive results. Indeed, a previous study revealed that certain animal husbandry or production practices may be associated with non-speci c reactions in the ELISA kit used in our study (9). To increase the speci city of the test, they suggested to use a higher cut-off of 1.0 S/P value in contrast to 0.4 which is recommended by the vendor and used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another explanation could be that the positive ELISA results of the samples taken at week 11 in batch 2 represented false positive results. Indeed, a previous study revealed that certain animal husbandry or production practices may be associated with non-speci c reactions in the ELISA kit used in our study (9). To increase the speci city of the test, they suggested to use a higher cut-off of 1.0 S/P value in contrast to 0.4 which is recommended by the vendor and used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%