2002
DOI: 10.1177/104649640203300101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation to Self-Managing Work Teams

Abstract: Two studies examined the team member characteristics (Big Five personality traits and attitude toward self-managing teams) that predict successful adaptation to participation in self-managing work teams (SMWTs) as assessed by self-ratings and manager ratings. Adaptation is conceptualized as having an immediate or short-term dimension (performing the team’s task well) and an enduring or long-term dimension (full cooperation in the team and commitment to team self-management). In both studies, member conscientio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students associated a climate of openness (differences of opinion openly discussed) with both the quality of information they contribute to team discussions (people state their assumptions), and managing their emotional responses to being challenged (accepting criticism non‐defensively). In associating self management and a climate of interpersonal trust and openness, are indicating a key way to negotiate the difficult balance in group learning between robust dialogue and unproductive conflict, or in Tjosvold's (1986) terms, between cooperative and competitive conflict. The proposition that when group members engage in self‐monitoring, a more productive basis is established for challenging others, has received a measure of theoretical support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students associated a climate of openness (differences of opinion openly discussed) with both the quality of information they contribute to team discussions (people state their assumptions), and managing their emotional responses to being challenged (accepting criticism non‐defensively). In associating self management and a climate of interpersonal trust and openness, are indicating a key way to negotiate the difficult balance in group learning between robust dialogue and unproductive conflict, or in Tjosvold's (1986) terms, between cooperative and competitive conflict. The proposition that when group members engage in self‐monitoring, a more productive basis is established for challenging others, has received a measure of theoretical support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a study by Tosi et al (1997), used college students to study decision-making. Thoms et al (2002) conducted a similar study using both college student teams and hospital teams on the behavior of self-managed work teams with nearly identical results. These results provide some supportive evidence that our use of college students was appropriate and that studies drawing from this population do not necessarily hinder generalizabilty.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Strategic Skillsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These changes are complex, because they create defensive behaviors [3]. Finally, a third problem is that effectiveness of team work (in particular, self-managing teams) tend to be mediated by the personality of the team members, as studied by Thoms et al [33] and Acuña et al [1]. Therefore, the adoption of self-management can be a much more complex than the adoption of a new method or practice of software development.…”
Section: Benefits and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%