2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01697.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation to larval malnutrition does not affect fluctuating asymmetry inDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Both stress during development and response to directional selection were proposed to lead to reduced developmental stability of an organism, commonly measured as fluctuating asymmetry. Here, we investigated the direct physiological (plastic) effect of larval malnutrition and the effect of evolutionary adaptation to this form of stress on developmental stability, measured as fluctuating asymmetry of several wing measurements. The measurements were made on female Drosophila melanogaster from populations which, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when multiple traits were analyzed jointly and the amount of FA exceeded the measurement error by a large and significant margin, the specimens under severe protein reduction did not display higher levels of FA compared to the control group. This is in agreement with some of the previous experiments on other organisms that also failed to find higher levels of FA in phenotypic traits under conditions of nutritional stress (Stige et al, 2004; Vishalakshi and Singh, 2007; Vijendravarma et al, 2011). Although findings in animal models have to be taken with caution because they are difficult to extrapolate to other species, similarities in developmental structure between human and rodent skulls (Martinez-Abadias et al, 2012) validate the inferences made from this study regarding the effect of environmental factors on fluctuating asymmetry in human populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Even when multiple traits were analyzed jointly and the amount of FA exceeded the measurement error by a large and significant margin, the specimens under severe protein reduction did not display higher levels of FA compared to the control group. This is in agreement with some of the previous experiments on other organisms that also failed to find higher levels of FA in phenotypic traits under conditions of nutritional stress (Stige et al, 2004; Vishalakshi and Singh, 2007; Vijendravarma et al, 2011). Although findings in animal models have to be taken with caution because they are difficult to extrapolate to other species, similarities in developmental structure between human and rodent skulls (Martinez-Abadias et al, 2012) validate the inferences made from this study regarding the effect of environmental factors on fluctuating asymmetry in human populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…D. melanogaster were maintained at 25 °C in 12-h light:12-h dark conditions, on a standard yeast–cornmeal diet ( 46 ). Wild-type Canton S strain of D. melanogaster was used ( 47 ), unless noted otherwise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In insects, FA have increased under environmental stress factors such as temperature (Chapman & Goulson, 2000; Trotta et al , 2005, nutritional stress (Imasheva et al , 1999), parasitic infection (Polak, 1993) or chemicals (Abaga et al , 2011), as well as under genetic stress factors such as inbreeding (Carter et al , 2009), homozygosity (Messier & Mitton, 1996) or hybridization (Ross & Robertson, 1990). Nevertheless, some studies did not demonstrate considerable changes in the level of FA caused by environmental stress (e.g., nutritional stress, Vijendravarma et al , 2011; crowding, Chapman & Goulson, 2000; temperature, Jones et al , 2005) or genetic stress (e.g., inbreeding, Clarke et al , 1986; Fowler & Whitlock, 1994; Carter et al , 2009; hybridization, Smith et al , 1997). These differences may result from the fact that the impact of stress on FA seems to be species-, trait- or stressor-specific (Bjorksten et al , 2000; Beasley et al , 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%