2017
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201700307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of the Experimental Background (ATEB) Method in Voltammetric Determination of Thujone in Herbal Matrices

Abstract: In this work, a new baseline correction method, named the Adaptation of The Experimental Background (ATEB), based on the subtraction of the blank sample signal (registered for solution without an analyte, for example a supporting electrolyte), was introduced. However, the method was something more than the simple subtraction of the blank sample signal. An innovation of the algorithm consisted in improving of the blank sample signal through application of the polynomials. Operation of the algorithm was demonstr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental background was subtracted by approximation using third-degree polynomials *For 7.40 mg/dm 3 of eugenol, 5.55 mg/dm 3 of carvacrol, and 4.10 mg/dm 3 of thymol - Fig Concentration/mg/dm The background subtraction procedure (baseline correction) was chosen in such a way that the value of the RMSECV was as small as possible. Different types of baseline subtraction strategies have been tested, including PLS Toolbox function which calculates weighted baseline by the second-or third-degree polynomial with autoscaling procedure and next an innovative ATEB procedure [65]. However, they brought no satisfactory results: RMSECV for raw data was 0.38-0.97 mg/dm 3 , and after background subtraction 0.58-1.80 mg/dm 3 , depending on the phenolic terpenoid and the assumed LV number.…”
Section: Multivariate Pls Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental background was subtracted by approximation using third-degree polynomials *For 7.40 mg/dm 3 of eugenol, 5.55 mg/dm 3 of carvacrol, and 4.10 mg/dm 3 of thymol - Fig Concentration/mg/dm The background subtraction procedure (baseline correction) was chosen in such a way that the value of the RMSECV was as small as possible. Different types of baseline subtraction strategies have been tested, including PLS Toolbox function which calculates weighted baseline by the second-or third-degree polynomial with autoscaling procedure and next an innovative ATEB procedure [65]. However, they brought no satisfactory results: RMSECV for raw data was 0.38-0.97 mg/dm 3 , and after background subtraction 0.58-1.80 mg/dm 3 , depending on the phenolic terpenoid and the assumed LV number.…”
Section: Multivariate Pls Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supporting electrolyte was 5‐mL acetate buffer (pH = 6.0). The composition of the supporting electrolyte and the measurement parameters were determined basing on previous experience …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of the supporting electrolyte and the measurement parameters were determined basing on previous experience. 45,56,57 All signals were registered using the LAPV by adding 30 μL of the sample (three samples for each herbal composition) into the supporting electrolyte. Then, the solution was stirred (ca.…”
Section: Standard Procedures Of Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%