2006
DOI: 10.1007/11783237_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of Image Quality Using Various Filter Setups in the Filtered Backprojection Approach for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we optimise the parameters of a simple yet versatile frequency filter, namely the sinc filter. While the literature on FBP for tomosynthesis has examined filters of different parametric forms Orman et al, 2006;Ludwig et al, 2008), we concentrate on this filter because it can be varied continuously between a standard ramp filter and a filter with smooth high-frequency roll-off by tuning a single parameter. The filter is given by Fig.…”
Section: Fbp Filter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we optimise the parameters of a simple yet versatile frequency filter, namely the sinc filter. While the literature on FBP for tomosynthesis has examined filters of different parametric forms Orman et al, 2006;Ludwig et al, 2008), we concentrate on this filter because it can be varied continuously between a standard ramp filter and a filter with smooth high-frequency roll-off by tuning a single parameter. The filter is given by Fig.…”
Section: Fbp Filter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detector was operated in full resolution mode, thus yielding a data acquisition time of 20 s per breast. Image reconstruction was performed by filtered backprojection [25,26].…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…initialize x, p, and θ 2. holding p, θ fixed, optimize over x (image update) 3. holding x, θ fixed, optimize over p (measure field update) 4.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of incomplete angular sampling, it also suffers from an underrepresentation of low frequency content (resulting in low contrast for larger masses), an inability to respect object support, and the generation of additional streak artifacts. While several filter designs have been proposed to alleviate these problems [2,3], the use of FBP in emission tomography and limited angle transmission tomography inevitably leads to reconstructions that are streaky and, to varying extents, unfaithful to the original projection data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%