2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of Cross Entropy optimisation to a dynamic Bridge WIM calibration problem

Abstract: Publication information Engineering Structures, 44 (44): 13-22Publisher Elsevier Item record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4858 Publisher's statementThis is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Engineering Structures. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further adaption of the CE optimisation process used here is in the substructuring of the problem. Each unknown is substantially independent of the other unknowns, and therefore objective subfunctions can be defined . The objective subfunctions are defined as the squared differences between each of the n displacements calculated for each of the p trial profiles, dnormalinormalC, and each of the n displacements from the measured profile, dnormalinormalM normaldiCnormaldiM20.25em0.25emi=1,2,n…”
Section: Adapted Ce Optimisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further adaption of the CE optimisation process used here is in the substructuring of the problem. Each unknown is substantially independent of the other unknowns, and therefore objective subfunctions can be defined . The objective subfunctions are defined as the squared differences between each of the n displacements calculated for each of the p trial profiles, dnormalinormalC, and each of the n displacements from the measured profile, dnormalinormalM normaldiCnormaldiM20.25em0.25emi=1,2,n…”
Section: Adapted Ce Optimisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dowling et al . use an adapted CE optimisation method to develop a calibration procedure for a moving force identification algorithm. The general system global mass and stiffness matrices of the bridge FE model are found by best fit optimisation to match field measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Moving Force Identification (MFI) techniques have been applied to measured signals to improve the accuracy of the measured axle weights [7]. These techniques have been found to improve the accuracy of the systems but a report on the accuracy classification of several B-WIM installations found that current accuracy levels are sufficient for selecting vehicles to be weighed using static scales, but insufficient for direct enforcement [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research [5] has developed theoretical models for B-WIM and demonstrated that Tikhonov Regularization can be used to improve ill-conditioned Moses equations which occur when axles are closely spaced relative to the bridge span. More recently, moving force identification (MFI) techniques have been applied to measured signals to improve the accuracy of the measured axle weights [6,9,10]. These techniques have been found to improve the accuracy of the systems [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%