Adaptation costs to constant and alternating polluted environments

Abstract

Some populations quickly adapt to strong and novel selection pressures caused by anthropogenic stressors. However, this short‐term evolutionary response to novel and harsh environmental conditions may lead to adaptation costs, and evaluating these costs is important if we want to understand the evolution of resistance to anthropogenic stressors. In this experimental evolution study, we exposed Caenorhabditis elegans populations to uranium (U populations), salt (NaCl populations) and alternating uranium/salt treatments (U/NaCl populations) and to a control environment (C populations), over 22 generations. In parallel, we ran common‐garden and reciprocal‐transplant experiments to assess the adaptive costs for populations that have evolved in the different environmental conditions. Our results showed rapid evolutionary changes in life history characteristics of populations exposed to the different pollution regimes. Furthermore, adaptive costs depended on the type of pollutant: pollution‐adapted populations had lower fitness than C populations, when the populations were returned to their original environment. Fitness in uranium environments was lower for NaCl populations than for U populations. In contrast, fitness in salt environments was similar between U and NaCl populations. Moreover, fitness of U/NaCl populations showed similar or higher fitness in both the uranium and the salt environments compared to populations adapted to constant uranium or salt environments. Our results show that adaptive evolution to a particular stressor can lead to either adaptive costs or benefits once in contact with another stressor. Furthermore, we did not find any evidence that adaptation to alternating stressors was associated with additional adaption costs. This study highlights the need to incorporate adaptive cost assessments when undertaking ecological risk assessments of pollutants.

Selection on a single trait does not recapitulate the evolution of life-history traits seen during an invasion

“…By supporting that adaptation in one environment may induce benefits and costs in another environment (Dutilleul et al 2017), our results underline the importance that G × E interactions could have for the studies of biological invasions. Indeed, native and invaded environments are likely to be different (Reznick and Ghalambor 2001) and the invaded environments may themselves undergo substantial changes during the course of the invasion (Sakai et al 2001).…”

Effects of Pollution on Fish Behavior, Personality, and Cognition: Some Research Perspectives

“…Adaptation to a particular stressor (e.g., contamination) might for instance impede the adaptation to another stressor (e.g., parasite). Thus, adaptation to pollution might come at a cost, depending on additional stressors (e.g., Dutilleul et al, 2017). For instance, tolerance to pesticides is associated with increased susceptibility to diseases in some amphibians and crustaceans (e.g., Hua et al, 2017;Jansen et al, 2011).…”

Unusual evolution of tree frog populations in the Chernobyl exclusion zone

“…10 generations from the accident), in the CEZ, female tree frogs may start to breed at 2-year age in order to speed up life-history strategy. A shorter generation time may be an adaptive response to cope with the accumulation of damage in stressful environments 87,88 , as those with radioactive contamination.…”