Adaptation and validation of Child Oral Impact on Daily Performance index in 11-14-year-old Chilean school children

Abstract

Abstract:The health condition of a population is often rated through clinical indicators. However, the psychological and social impact of diseases on quality of life has been noticed of late. Objective: to adapt, in cultural terms, the Child-Oral Impact on Daily Performance (C-OIDP) questionnaire in its self-administered form and evaluate its psychometric properties among Chilean teenagers aged 11-14 from the city of Licantén, Chile, in 2013. Methodology: A cross-sectional study on scales validation. Face validity was determined by experts opinion, criterion validity by correlation with measures of selfrated health and dental treatment needs, internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha, and temporal stability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest within a 10-day window. The sample consisted of 203 students aged 11 to 14 years from the urban sector of Licantén city. Results: Five experts determined proper face validity of the C-OIDP scale. Regarding criterion validity, statistically significance association (p<0.05) were found, positive for treatment need and negative for oral health satisfaction. Internal consistency scale showed an alpha = 0.719, all items showed correlations of 0.32 to 0.54 with the rest of the scale. The temporal stability gave an ICC=0.82. . Conclusion: the cultural adaptation of the self-administered C-OIDP questionnaire for Chilean students aged 11 to 14 years showed adequate psychometric properties, so it is a valid and reliable instrument to measure the oral health impact on quality of life in this population.

Psychometric evaluation of the child oral impacts on daily performances (C-OIDP) for use in Turkish primary school children: a cross sectional validation study

“…The most prevalent oral problem reported was sensitive teeth followed by toothache, which were similar to previous studies conducted in Brazil [12], Sudan [16], Italy [15], Israel [19], Malaysia [17], North India [24], and Moroccan [21]. In agreement with most studies [11,12,14,15,17,18,[20][21][22]29], we found that the performances with the highest frequencies impacts were eating, cleaning mouth and smiling; while the performances with the lowest impact were "studying" and relaxing. This is not surprising, because impacts on functional limitations and psychological well being were more prevalant than impact on social wellbeing social during children's transition to adolescence [47,50].…”

“…The Turkish C-OIDP showed acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The Cronbach's alpha was higher than the values reported from previous studies conducted in France [10], England [11], Brazil [12], Peru [13], Spain [14], Italy [15], Chile [18], South India [20] and Moroccan [21]. The ICC was similar to the validation studies in Chile [18], France [10] and South India [20].…”

“…As a socio-dental indicator, the Child Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (C-OIDP) has been commonly used to assess children's oral health needs in population surveys as well as in clinical studies because of being easier and short [6][7][8][9]. This scale was developed and tested in Thai children aged 11-12 years [9] and it was then translated and validated for use in many countries [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. This composite socio-dental indicator is based on the framework of consequences of oral impact which presents a modified version of both the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps of the World Health Organization and Locker's model and it focuses on three different levels (the impairment, the intermediate level-pain, discomfort, functional limitation and dissatisfaction with appearance, and the ultimate impacts) in the assessment of oral health consequences [9,27].…”

Non-clinical factors and predictors of self-ratings of oral health among young adolescents in a rural Nigerian population

“…Bivariate analysis showed that positive rating of oral health was associated with self-perceived satisfaction with appearance of teeth and oral condition, this is in line with previous findings that subjective assessment of oral health correlate strongly with each other as reported by authors of previous studies [21][22][23][24] . However, on multivariate analysis, only the relationship of satisfaction with oral condition was statistically significant.…”

Impacto de la salud bucal en la calidad de vida de escolares de 11 a 14 años, Licantén, 2013

“…Solo 2 han sido adaptados transculturalmente y validados en el idioma español: el Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale para padres 6,7 y el Child Oral Impacts on Daily Performances Index (Child-OIDP) desarrollado específica-mente para niños 8---10 . Este último recientemente validado en Chile para escolares entre 11-14 años 11 .…”