2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13235-013-0085-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation and the Allocation of Pollution Reduction Costs

Abstract: Le Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative (CIREQ) regroupe des chercheurs dans les domaines de l'économétrie, la théorie de la décision, la macroéconomie et les marchés financiers, la microéconomie appliquée et l'économie expérimentale ainsi que l'économie de l'environnement et des ressources naturelles. Ils proviennent principalement des universités de Montréal, McGill et Concordia. Le CIREQ offre un milieu dynamique de recherche en économie quantitative grâce au grand nombre d'activi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We know that developed countries have a higher gross domestic product per capita and consequently are more susceptible to being damaged, but at the same time these countries have much larger financial and technological means than developing countries to adapt to climate change and lessen its impact. Our assumption is in line with the nascent literature considering not only mitigation when designing an IEA, but also adaptation efforts that aim at reducing the damage cost (see, for example, Benchekroun and Taherkhani, ; Breton and Sbragia, , ; Benchekroun et al., ; Lazkano et al., ; Masoudi and Zaccour, ).…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We know that developed countries have a higher gross domestic product per capita and consequently are more susceptible to being damaged, but at the same time these countries have much larger financial and technological means than developing countries to adapt to climate change and lessen its impact. Our assumption is in line with the nascent literature considering not only mitigation when designing an IEA, but also adaptation efforts that aim at reducing the damage cost (see, for example, Benchekroun and Taherkhani, ; Breton and Sbragia, , ; Benchekroun et al., ; Lazkano et al., ; Masoudi and Zaccour, ).…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The most obvious avenue for further research is to extend the models to the case of several countries with a competitive and cooperative behavior. It is commonly accepted in the environmental economics [1][2][3][4][5] that mitigation is a public good while the adaptation is specific for separate countries. This extension is imperative for analyzing possible international environmental agreements.…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several aggregate analytic approaches have been developed to describe pollution mitigation, but a surprisingly smaller number of papers uses an analytic approach to environmental adaptation [1,2,5,7,10,15,29], although adaptation becomes a more attractive option of the environmental protection. Even less papers consider endogenous production, mitigation, and adaptation in one model: the majority of them belong to a popular simulation approach known as the integrated assessment models [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptation-mitigation models can be deterministic or stochastic, static, or dynamic, in continuous or discrete time (including two-or threestage versions). Because of analytic complexity, all models make simplifying assumptions about production, pollution, mitigation, and adaptation [5,6,[9][10][11][12]. Corresponding optimization problems can involve one or several objectives, and one or many players [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A static game of [27] and a dynamic game of [28] include separate endogenous mitigation variable, nevertheless, do not consider adaptation. Paper [11] analyzes a static game of n countries with pollution and adaptation but does not explicitly include mitigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%