2017
DOI: 10.5231/psy.writ.2017.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptación de las escalas “Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment” y Goal Disengagement and Goal Reengagement”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four items measure the tendency to disengage from unattainable goals and six items measure the tendency to reengage with new goals. The Spanish version has adequate criteria validity, internal consistency, and stability, and its factor structure is in line with the original structure [41]. In this study, the goal disengagement and the goal reengagement scales had a Cronbach’s α of 0.70 and 0.94, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four items measure the tendency to disengage from unattainable goals and six items measure the tendency to reengage with new goals. The Spanish version has adequate criteria validity, internal consistency, and stability, and its factor structure is in line with the original structure [41]. In this study, the goal disengagement and the goal reengagement scales had a Cronbach’s α of 0.70 and 0.94, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment scales [3] assess two distinct modes of coping with goal disruption, respectively: tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment. Respondents rate the degree to which they agree with each statement on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “fully disagree” to “fully agree.” The Spanish version of the scales show good levels of reliability and adequate criteria validity as demonstrated by correlations with measures of positive and negative affect and well-being [41]. In this study, the tenacious goal pursuit and the flexible goal adjustment scales had a Cronbach’s α of 0.80 and 0.81, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Four items measure an individual's tendency to disengage from unattainable goals (e.g., “It's easy for me to reduce my effort toward the goal,” or “I stay committed to the goal for a long time; I can't let it go”) and six items measure an individual's tendency to reengage with new goals (e.g., “I seek other meaningful goals,” or “I start working on other new goals”). The Spanish version of the instrument has adequate criterion validity, internal consistency, and stability, and its factor structure is similar to the original structure [ 45 ]. In this study, the Goal Disengagement and the Goal Reengagement Scales had Cronbach's alpha of 0.70 and 0.94, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability, and correlations between the scales were also similar to the original scales. The scales also demonstrated adequate criterion validity [ 45 ]. In this study, the Tenacious Goal Pursuit and the Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales had Cronbach's alpha of 0.80 and 0.81, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both strategies are usually measured by a dispositional tool of goal adjustment capacity called the Goal Adjustment Scale (GAS, Wrosch et al, 2003a). The GAS has been widely used among the general (Soubrier, Esteve, & Ramírez-Maestre, 2017) as well as specific population (e.g., cancer patients; Schroevers, Kraaij, & Garnefski, 2011;Wrosch & Sabiston, 2013). In our research, we decided to address young people (adolescents and young adults with an average age of 20), because according to the theory (Wrosch, Scheier, & Miller, 2013) both late adolescence and transition to adulthood are important stages in the development of goal setting and goal adjustment capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%