Adaptación cultural y validación de la versión chilena del Cuestionario de Discapacidad Roland-Morris

Guic, Eliana; Galdames, Susan; Rebolledo, Policarpo

doi:10.4067/s0034-98872014000600005

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the studies (59%) were of at least adequate quality (26% doubtful and 15% inadequate). Eight study results could not be scored on the unidimensionality criteria because of incomplete reporting of EFA eigenvalues or explained variance [71,82,96,97,107,116,137,139], of a priori determined parameters of Rasch analysis (Appendix B) [118e120], or of CFA results because it was applied to the whole scale and not to the subscale of interest for this review (MPI-PI) [117].…”

Section: Quality and Results Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain

Chiarotto

Ostelo

Boers

et al. 2018

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Quality and Results Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain

Chiarotto

Ostelo

Boers

et al. 2018

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Adaptación cultural y validación de la versión chilena del Cuestionario de Discapacidad Roland-Morris 33…”

Section: Anexo 1 Alfa De Cronbachunclassified

Validación de medidas de resultados informados por los pacientes en Ortopedia y Traumatología

Vidal

Lira

Besa

et al. 2022

Revista Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatología

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEn los últimos años, ha habido un aumento en la aplicación de cuestionarios diseñados para la medición de resultados (o desenlaces) clínicos en la práctica médica. Para aplicar un cuestionario en una población distinta a la cual fue originalmente creado y diseñado, es necesario llevar a cabo un proceso riguroso de adaptación, con una determinada metodología. El objetivo de esta guía metodológica es describir el proceso de traducción, adaptación transcultural y validación de medidas de resultados informados por los pacientes (MRIPs) en Ortopedia y Traumatología.Nivel de evidencia: IV

show abstract

“…The degree of disability is assessed through specific questionnaires: the Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Waddell and Main Disability Index, or Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QB-PDS). The Oswestry and Ronald-Morris questionnaires are the most used and recommended worldwide [20][21][22] .…”

Section: Subjective Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The RMDQ is a self-administered instrument consisting of 24 items, with two response options (yes/no). Results range from 0, the absence of disability due to low back pain, to 24, maximum possible disability 21 . A disability below 4 points is very slight.…”

Section: Roland-morrismentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional Assessment of Subacute or Chronic Low Back Pain by Subjective and Objective Measures

Martínez-González¹,

Moreno-Díaz²,

Villarreal-Salcedo³

et al. 2021

RMU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to its high incidence, low back pain is a major problem from a social, health, and labor perspective. It is considered one of the most common causes of medical consultations in primary care, and one of the main reasons for temporary disability. A correct diagnostic approach and adequate therapeutic management will allow for better control of the clinical condition and its evolution. To do this, there are functional assessment techniques, both objective and subjective, which will provide fundamental information to perform appropriate management of the pathology, as well as to assess the effectiveness of the treatment. Within the subjective techniques, the Oswestry disability index is the most widely questionnaire used in hospitals, while the Roland Morris scale is used mainly in primary care. The results provided by the isokinetic and isoinertial techniques assess the functional capacity of the lumbar spine in an easy and convenient way for the patient. The main objective of this study is to present different subjective questionnaires and objective techniques to make a correct valuation of lumbar pain, improving access to adequate treatment and reducing work time.

show abstract

Adaptación cultural y validación de la versión chilena del Cuestionario de Discapacidad Roland-Morris

Abstract: (Rev Med Chile 2014; 142: 716-722)

Cited by 7 publications

References 12 publications

A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain

A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain

Validación de medidas de resultados informados por los pacientes en Ortopedia y Traumatología

Functional Assessment of Subacute or Chronic Low Back Pain by Subjective and Objective Measures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About