2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2016.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptación al español de la escala Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness para valorar el estigma personal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Internalized Stigma of Mental Health Illness (ISMI) [ 39 , 40 ] was used to assess subjective experience of self-stigma in people with mental illness. It is a 29-item scale with each itemrated on a four-point Likert scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 4 (totally agree), and divided into five subscales: alienation, stereotype endorsement, discrimination experience, social withdrawal and stigma resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Internalized Stigma of Mental Health Illness (ISMI) [ 39 , 40 ] was used to assess subjective experience of self-stigma in people with mental illness. It is a 29-item scale with each itemrated on a four-point Likert scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 4 (totally agree), and divided into five subscales: alienation, stereotype endorsement, discrimination experience, social withdrawal and stigma resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research [ 40 ] has shown that ISMI-29 exhibited good internal consistency (α = 0.87) and strong construct validity. ISMI was used in its Spanish version [ 42 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study uses the version of this scale translated into Spanish by the Andalusian Health Department [32]. The psychometric properties of this Spanish version were validated with good values for the total score of the scale: internal consistency reliability, Cronbach’s α value of 0.91, test-retest, r = 0.95 ( p < 0.001), and convergent validity confirmed as significant correlations ( p < 0.001) [33]. This instrument has been translated into more than 40 languages [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%