2017
DOI: 10.15517/rbt.v65i2.25721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptación acústica del canto de Turdus leucomelas (Passeriformes: Turdidae) a diferentes niveles de ruido antrópico, en el área metropolitana de Belém de Pará, Brasil

Abstract: Adaptación acústica del canto deAbstract: Acoustic adaptation in Turdus leucomelas (Passeriformes: Turdidae) songs to different levels of anthropogenic noise, in the metropolitan area of Belem, Para, Brazil. Anthropogenic noise in urban environments is a major challenge for those species that depend on the transmission of acoustic signals to communicate. To avoid being masked by background noise, some bird species are able to make adjustments in their songs. Studies on vocal adjustment for tropical birds are s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Work on the noise filter hypothesis has focused on either the minimum or the peak frequencies of vocalizations. Although the minimum frequency of vocalizations are most masked by anthropogenic noise and, within species, most often found to change in urban or noisy environments (e.g., Hu & Cardoso, 2010; Job et al, 2016; Redondo et al, 2013; Slabbekoorn & Boer‐Visser, 2006; Walters et al, 2019; Wood & Yezerinac, 2006; but see also Mendes, Colino‐Rabanal, & Peris, 2017), species differences in minimum frequency do not appear to be the best acoustic predictor of noise tolerance. For example, bird species occurring in cities were found to have, on average, higher peak frequencies but not higher minimum frequencies than closely related species not described as regularly inhabiting urban habitats (Hu & Cardoso, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work on the noise filter hypothesis has focused on either the minimum or the peak frequencies of vocalizations. Although the minimum frequency of vocalizations are most masked by anthropogenic noise and, within species, most often found to change in urban or noisy environments (e.g., Hu & Cardoso, 2010; Job et al, 2016; Redondo et al, 2013; Slabbekoorn & Boer‐Visser, 2006; Walters et al, 2019; Wood & Yezerinac, 2006; but see also Mendes, Colino‐Rabanal, & Peris, 2017), species differences in minimum frequency do not appear to be the best acoustic predictor of noise tolerance. For example, bird species occurring in cities were found to have, on average, higher peak frequencies but not higher minimum frequencies than closely related species not described as regularly inhabiting urban habitats (Hu & Cardoso, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo anterior podría contribuir a que el canto (o parte de este) se transmita a pesar del ruido ambiental, especialmente en temporada lluviosa, cuando el ruido es mayor (Kirschel et al, 2009). Resultados similares han sido reportados para las especies Pitangus sulphuratus y Turdus leucomelas (Mendes et al, 2017;Mendoza & Arce-Plata, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Singing effort and song length did not vary significantly relative to the weekly cycles in human activity, suggesting that birds did not increase signal redundancy as human activity levels increased. Unexpectedly, birds emitted duets with slightly higher maximum frequency (~80 Hz) on weekends than on weekdays (Mendes et al 2011(Mendes et al , 2017, whereas minimum frequency was unrelated to weekly cycles of human activity levels. We suggest that changes in the physical obstacles or barriers to sound propagation, and not noise, are more probable explanations for the slightly lower pitched Rufous Hornero duets on weekdays.…”
Section: Vocal Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%