2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptability, productivity, and educational incentives in a matching model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I complement the study by additionally highlighting differences in the separation rates into unemployment between skill groups and the impact of those differences on sorting patterns. My finding that versatility is an important determinant of job mobility supports theoretical models that feature multidimensional skills (Charlot et al, 2005;Lise and Postel-Vinay, 2014). Furthermore, my empirical study is in line with theoretical models that stress the impact of versatility on both the job-finding rate and the separation rate into unemployment (Stijepic, 2015b,c).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…I complement the study by additionally highlighting differences in the separation rates into unemployment between skill groups and the impact of those differences on sorting patterns. My finding that versatility is an important determinant of job mobility supports theoretical models that feature multidimensional skills (Charlot et al, 2005;Lise and Postel-Vinay, 2014). Furthermore, my empirical study is in line with theoretical models that stress the impact of versatility on both the job-finding rate and the separation rate into unemployment (Stijepic, 2015b,c).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Under choosy search, there is no restriction on the number of submarkets that each worker may prospect, but the requirement that expected matching gains must be positive on each submarket. In a model where education determines the scope of individual skills, Charlot et al (2005) also assume that the search market is segmented by technology, and workers only participate in market segments for which they have the relevant skills. However, individual productivity only depends on the technology, and there is no composition externality in their paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workers direct their search toward a particular market, but matching is random within this market. In the two-sector models of Charlot and Decreuse (2005) and Uren (2006), the participation decision thus generates a composition externality. 4 A key aspect of this article is to show that the composition externality survives when we consider horizontal heterogeneity-workers have similar levels of skills, but in different fields-rather than vertical heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planner takes the joint distribution of schooling cost and ability as given 8 and maximizes the discounted path of aggregate consumption. When the rate of time preference ρ tends to 0, we have:…”
Section: Centralized Economymentioning
confidence: 99%