Adaptability on Shifting Ground: a Rapid Qualitative Assessment of Multi-institutional Inpatient Surge Planning and Workforce Deployment During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Background During the initial wave of COVID-19 hospitalizations, care delivery and workforce adaptations were rapidly implemented. In response to subsequent surges of patients, institutions have deployed, modified, and/or discontinued their workforce plans. Objective Using rapid qualitative methods, we sought to explore hospitalists’ experiences with workforce deployment, types of clinicians deployed, and challenges encountered with subsequent iterations of surge planning during the COVID-19 pandemic across a collaborative of hospital medicine groups. Approach Using rapid qualitative methods, focus groups were conducted in partnership with the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN). We interviewed physicians, advanced practice providers (APP), and physician researchers about (1) ongoing adaptations to the workforce as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) current struggles with workforce planning, and (3) evolution of workforce planning. Key Results We conducted five focus groups with 33 individuals from 24 institutions, representing 52% of HOMERuN sites. A variety of adaptations was described by participants, some common across institutions and others specific to the institution’s location and context. Adaptations implemented shifted from the first waves of COVID patients to subsequent waves. Three global themes also emerged: (1) adaptability and comfort with dynamic change, (2) the importance of the unique hospitalist skillset for effective surge planning and redeployment, and (3) the lack of universal solutions. Conclusions Hospital workforce adaptations to the COVID pandemic continued to evolve. While few approaches were universally effective in managing surges of patients, and successful adaptations were highly context dependent, the ability to navigate a complex system, adaptability, and comfort in a chaotic, dynamic environment were themes considered most critical to successful surge management. However, resource constraints and sustained high workload levels raised issues of burnout. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07480-x.

The Role of the Temporary Contracting and Visiting Doctor Program in Supporting the Health System during and after COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia

“…Hiring additional staff as a measure to increase the supply of health workers supports the existing staff and prevent work overload. On the other hand, maximizing the utilization of the existing staff, through increasing the work shifts for example, can lead to staff burnout and to negative patient outcomes ( 12 , 23 , 24 ). In the United States of America (USA), a survey reported that the main reason for hiring temporary staff reported by more than 70% of health facilities during COVID-19 pandemic was to prevent the burnout of the existing staff ( 25 ).…”

Building a thriving academic hospitalist workforce: A rapid qualitative analysis identifying key areas of focus in the field

“…The focus groups were conducted in partnership with the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) and included physicians, advanced practice providers, and hospital medicine researchers. The HOMERuN network is a collaborative of hospitals, hospitalists, and multidisciplinary care teams founded in 2011 that further supported joint efforts during the COVID‐19 pandemic 11–14 . The focus group session was facilitated by the workforce planning subgroup within the HOMERuN network.…”

“…The HOMERuN network is a collaborative of hospitals, hospitalists, and multidisciplinary care teams founded in 2011 that further supported joint efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. [11][12][13][14] The focus group session was facilitated by the workforce planning subgroup within the HOMERuN network. To limit bias in participation, any employee (e.g., clinician, researcher, administrator, patient advocate) in a hospital medicine division who is interested in joining the network is able to participate.…”

“…Following the focus groups, we utilized a rapid qualitative analysis process to analyze the content of the focus groups, applying methods similar to prior work. [17][18][19][20] Rapid qualitative methods have been previously described, consisting of a structured analysis that can be useful in situations of dynamic, rapidly changing real-world situations (such as a pandemic). 18,21 Templated summaries were created for each of the interviews and focus groups.…”

Assessing hospitalists' opinions regarding the role of environmental health within the practice of hospital medicine

“…Three focus groups were conducted concurrently as breakout rooms during the meeting as the main part of the agenda, as has been done previously. 27 Focus groups allowed participants to collaborate and build off each other's thoughts to generate ideas surrounding the topic, specifically environmental health. 28 The University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board reviewed HOMERuN Collaborative Survey and Qualitative Research activities as "not human subjects research," study # 22-36424.…”