2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-70332013000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptability and stability of sweet sorghum cultivars

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were significant differences (P < 0.05) among sweet sorghum genotypes for all the agro-industrial traits (Tables 1 and 2). This significance can be considered as evidence of genetic variability, as has also been reported in other studies (Pfeiffer et al, 2010;Tomar et al, 2012;Souza et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…There were significant differences (P < 0.05) among sweet sorghum genotypes for all the agro-industrial traits (Tables 1 and 2). This significance can be considered as evidence of genetic variability, as has also been reported in other studies (Pfeiffer et al, 2010;Tomar et al, 2012;Souza et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Genotype × site interaction (P < 0.05) was also observed for most of the traits, except for juice extraction (EXT). Some studies on sweet sorghum have indicated the presence of the genotype × environment interaction for traits related to ethanol yield (ETH) (Umakanth et al 2012, Souza et al 2013, Elangovan et al 2014, Figueiredo et al 2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L.) as the main feedstock. Nevertheless, the sugarcane crop has some particular features that compromise the feedstock supply for sugarcane mills, such as the renewal rate of crop areas (~20% each year) and the off-season period (Souza et al 2013). Currently, about 2 mi ha of sugarcane crop area is under renewal, and the period from March to April is the off-season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For May et al (2012) and Souza et al (2013), this occurs probably due to the better use of water, light and nutrients by plants, as well as the longer period in the field, since the plants harvested at 120 DAS had better results, in relation to the stem diameter. In the second sowing season and in its two harvest dates, stem diameter was not influenced by the increasing row spacing for the crop.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%