1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02684477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adams methods for the efficient solution of stochastic differential equations with additive noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the inverse cascade regime where the nonlinear deterministic dynamics dominate the stochastic forcing, the numerical error is dominated by the deterministic part of the dynamics and a higher-accuracy treatment of the deterministic terms is justified. 27 The nondimensional width of the domain is in most cases L = 3, though in several cases it is reduced to L = 2 to allow increased resolution at fixed N. These values are large enough that the energy has room to spread outside the forcing region, yet small enough to be computationally tractable. The characteristic wavelength of the energy forcing should be less than the diameter of the forcing region, i.e., λ f = 2π/k f ≤ 1.…”
Section: -3 Ian Grooms Phys Fluids 27 101701 (2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the inverse cascade regime where the nonlinear deterministic dynamics dominate the stochastic forcing, the numerical error is dominated by the deterministic part of the dynamics and a higher-accuracy treatment of the deterministic terms is justified. 27 The nondimensional width of the domain is in most cases L = 3, though in several cases it is reduced to L = 2 to allow increased resolution at fixed N. These values are large enough that the energy has room to spread outside the forcing region, yet small enough to be computationally tractable. The characteristic wavelength of the energy forcing should be less than the diameter of the forcing region, i.e., λ f = 2π/k f ≤ 1.…”
Section: -3 Ian Grooms Phys Fluids 27 101701 (2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is more complicated, however, once spontaneous emission is included. Equation (12) becomes (15) Even though both and are independent Gaussian processes, it is not entirely correct to replace the noise term on the right side with a single Gaussian noise process, because the optical phase is a dynamical variable stochastically perturbed by a noise term , which is correlated with the intensity noise.…”
Section: B Spontaneous Emission Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, without loss of generality, we can define a new random variable , and this has exactly the same statistics as , namely , with each component being a random complex Gaussian as before. Thus, the explicit integration algorithm that we employ reads (20) In the simulation of some toy model problems (not shown), this algorithm produced results for the distribution of intensity that were the same as integrating the complex equation of motion, whereas integrating the equivalent of (15), assuming a single noise source on the intensity, gave incorrect answers.…”
Section: B Spontaneous Emission Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For β 2 = 0, the stochastic multi-step scheme (1.2) is explicit, otherwise it is drift-implicit. See also [3,4,7,8,9,13,14,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%