Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding versus scheduled interval feeding for preterm infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To meet the principles of developmental neonatal care with minimising unnecessary exposure to external stimuli and clustering care activities, the optimal policy would be a feeding on demand. However, a recent meta‐analysis did not find sufficient evidence to support that policy (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the principles of developmental neonatal care with minimising unnecessary exposure to external stimuli and clustering care activities, the optimal policy would be a feeding on demand. However, a recent meta‐analysis did not find sufficient evidence to support that policy (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that overall findings support cautious contention that demand feeding might prove to be the feeding approach of choice for most healthy preterm infants. In contrast, Tosh and McGuire [2006] concluded following a standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group that there are insufficient data to guide clinical practice as of the date of their review. They urged a large randomized controlled trial to focus on infants in the transition phase from gavage to oral feeding that should be of sufficient duration to assess effects on growth and time to oral feeding and hospital discharge.…”
Section: Facilitation Of Oral Feeding (Breast and Bottle)mentioning
confidence: 99%