2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
39
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Anterior elevation was improved in the RTSA group compared with the non-operative group (110°versus 98°); however, there were more complications in the RTSA group (7% versus 0%) [85]. Furthermore, delayed primary RTSA compared with acute primary RTSA yielded similar clinical results and reoperation rates, suggesting that perhaps in this frail population a trial of non-operative management may be prudent when appropriate [86].…”
Section: Proximal Humerus Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Anterior elevation was improved in the RTSA group compared with the non-operative group (110°versus 98°); however, there were more complications in the RTSA group (7% versus 0%) [85]. Furthermore, delayed primary RTSA compared with acute primary RTSA yielded similar clinical results and reoperation rates, suggesting that perhaps in this frail population a trial of non-operative management may be prudent when appropriate [86].…”
Section: Proximal Humerus Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is reasonable in a polytrauma patient at high risk for surgery to attempt a trial of nonoperative management followed by late rTSA if nonoperative management fails; these delayed rTSAs have been shown to have no difference in forward flexion, clinical outcome, or all-cause reoperation. 56 In fact, the delayed group in the study had significantly better external rotation than the acute group. Another study compared acute rTSA versus rTSA to salvage failed ORIF.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…RSA is additionally associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications than hemiarthroplasty [ 13 ]. There is no difference in clinical outcome scores, forward flexion or risk of reoperation between acute RSA and delayed RSA [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%