2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0218810417720236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Traumatic Swan Neck Deformity: A Case Report of the Oblique Retinacular Ligament Lesion

Abstract: Swan neck deformity (SND) can be the manifestation of an acute trauma. We present a case report of a young basketball player with an acute traumatic SND determined by the single ulnar oblique retinacular ligament rupture. The patient caught a ball directly upon the tip of his right’s hand middle finger into extension. He immediately presented a SND with impossibility to actively flex the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ), while preserving active flexion and extension of the distal interphalangeal joint (DI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will create an extension lag which the DIP joint couldn't reach maximum DIP joint extension. The acute traumatic mallet finger presented by the terminal extensor tendon presents anatomical disruption, like the basketball player who caught a ball with the tip of finger while the PIP and DIP joint is in active extension [ 16 ]. Zancolli has classified the post-traumatic mallet finger into three categories: extrinsic, intrinsic, and articular [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will create an extension lag which the DIP joint couldn't reach maximum DIP joint extension. The acute traumatic mallet finger presented by the terminal extensor tendon presents anatomical disruption, like the basketball player who caught a ball with the tip of finger while the PIP and DIP joint is in active extension [ 16 ]. Zancolli has classified the post-traumatic mallet finger into three categories: extrinsic, intrinsic, and articular [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%