Acute Thermic Effect of Food in Response to Consumption of Whey Protein Microgels in Overweight Adults

Kassis, Amira; Moille, Sophie; Nielsen-Moennoz, Corinne; Godin, Jean‐Philippe; Sauser, Julien; Monnard, Irina; Ammon-Zufferey, Corinne; Beaumont, Maurice; Macé, Katherine

doi:10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.746.5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous work has shown that protein has a higher thermic effect than both carbohydrate and fat intake ( 47 ). WP has been shown to increase the thermic effect of food ( 48 ) and to a greater extent than other protein sources such as soy and casein ( 49 ). Therefore, WP supplementation may be a viable option for IET soldiers and individuals who are engaging in exercise training while trying to reduce FM.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Whey Protein Supplementation Effects on Body Composition, Performance, and Blood Biomarkers During Army Initial Entry Training

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study assesses if a lower dose of whey protein can provide similar benefits to those shown in previous work supplementing Army Initial Entry Training (IET) Soldiers with two servings of whey protein (WP) per day. Eighty-one soldiers consumed one WP or a calorie matched carbohydrate (CHO) serving/day during IET (WP: n = 39, height = 173 ± 8 cm, body mass = 76.8 ± 12.8 kg, age = 21 ± 3 years; CHO: n = 42, 175 ± 8 cm, 77.8 ± 15.3 kg, 23 ± 4 years). Physical performance (push-ups, sit-ups, and a two-mile run) was assessed during weeks two and eight. All other measures (dietary intake, body composition, blood biomarkers) at weeks one and nine. There was a significant group difference for fat mass (p = 0.044) as WP lost 2.1 ± 2.9 kg and had a moderate effect size (Cohen's d: −0.24), whereas the CHO group lost 0.9 ± 2.5 kg and had only a small effect size (d: −0.1). There was no significant group-by-time interaction on fat-free mass (p = 0.069). WP gained 1.2 ± 2.4 (d: 0.1) and CHO gained 0.1 ± 3 (d: 0) kg of FFM on average. There was a significant group by week 1-fat free mass interaction (p = 0.003) indicating individuals with higher initial fat-free mass benefitted more from WP. There were no group differences for push-up (p = 0.514), sit-up (p = 0.429) or run (p = 0.313) performance. For all biomarkers there was a significant effect of time as testosterone (p < 0.01), testosterone to cortisol ratio (p = 0.39), and IGF-1 (p < 0.01) increased across training and cortisol (p = 0.04) and IL-6 (p < 0.01) decreased. There were no differences in groups across IET for any of the biomarkers. We conclude one WP serving is beneficial for FM and for FFM in soldiers with high baseline FFM but may not significantly alter biomarker response or physical performance of IET soldiers who have high relative dietary protein intakes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%