2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrex.2006.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute suppurative appendicitis complicating ileocolic intussusception due to a caecal lipoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the location of the lipoma, 13 cases were in the cecal wall, 8 were in the ileocecal valve, and 3 in were the appendiceal orifice, with two cases unreported. Of the three cases with appendiceal involvement, pathological examinations demonstrated the location of cecal lipoma over the appendiceal orifice in two cases with acute suppurative appendicitis[3,4]. Our case was the only one that showed features of chronic appendicitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the location of the lipoma, 13 cases were in the cecal wall, 8 were in the ileocecal valve, and 3 in were the appendiceal orifice, with two cases unreported. Of the three cases with appendiceal involvement, pathological examinations demonstrated the location of cecal lipoma over the appendiceal orifice in two cases with acute suppurative appendicitis[3,4]. Our case was the only one that showed features of chronic appendicitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Review of the literature demonstrated that only one patient expired after surgery due to acute appendicitis complicated with septic shock and severe comorbidities[3], while all others recovered well postoperatively, suggesting the safety of surgical treatment for this patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge for pediatric surgeons in intussusception is the diagnosis and treatment of invaginations caused by pathological leading points [1,2,5,10]. In those patients, USG has a 75% sensitivity and specificity rate whereas CT has 50% [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%