2012
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2012.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Stress Induces Selective Alterations in Cost/Benefit Decision-Making

Abstract: Acute stress can exert beneficial or detrimental effects on different forms of cognition. In the present study, we assessed the effects of acute restraint stress on different forms of cost/benefit decision-making, and some of the hormonal and neurochemical mechanisms that may underlie these effects. Effort-based decision-making was assessed where rats chose between a low effort/reward (1 press=2 pellets) or high effort/reward option (4 pellets), with the effort requirement increasing over 4 blocks of trials (2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
110
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
14
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 4a, ICV infusion of 3 μg CRF did not significantly alter decision-making on this simpler task (F(1,8) = 0.86, n.s.). Interestingly, these treatments did significantly increase choice latencies (main effect of treatment: F(1,8) = 8.76, po0.05; treatment × block interaction: F(3,24) = 2.50, p = 0.08; Figure 4b) in a manner similar to the effects of restraint on performance of this task (Shafiei et al, 2012). However, trial omissions were unaffected (vehicle = 0; CRF = 1.4+/ − 0.8; t(8) = 1.77, n.s.).…”
Section: Central Crf Infusion Does Not Disrupt Reward Magnitude Discrmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 4a, ICV infusion of 3 μg CRF did not significantly alter decision-making on this simpler task (F(1,8) = 0.86, n.s.). Interestingly, these treatments did significantly increase choice latencies (main effect of treatment: F(1,8) = 8.76, po0.05; treatment × block interaction: F(3,24) = 2.50, p = 0.08; Figure 4b) in a manner similar to the effects of restraint on performance of this task (Shafiei et al, 2012). However, trial omissions were unaffected (vehicle = 0; CRF = 1.4+/ − 0.8; t(8) = 1.77, n.s.).…”
Section: Central Crf Infusion Does Not Disrupt Reward Magnitude Discrmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Previous work from our laboratory revealed that 1 h of restraint stress markedly reduced preference for larger rewards associated with a greater effort cost (Shafiei et al, 2012). It is well established that this form of acute stress increases circulating corticosterone levels and also enhances dopamine efflux in regions such as the prefrontal cortex and amygdala (Imperato et al, 1991;Jackson and Moghaddam, 2004;Del Arco et al, 2015).…”
Section: Stress Cost/benefit Decision-making and Crfmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations