2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute shortening versus bone transport for the treatment of infected femur non-unions with bone defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of techniques exists for the management of bone loss in the femur, each with their own risk profile. For smaller defects, acute shortening then lengthening is likely a more predictable option 3 , 18 , 19 ; however, this needs to be weighed up with the limits of soft-tissue shortening. 20 , 21 Bone transport may be more suitable for larger defects but equally comes with a greater potential for complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of techniques exists for the management of bone loss in the femur, each with their own risk profile. For smaller defects, acute shortening then lengthening is likely a more predictable option 3 , 18 , 19 ; however, this needs to be weighed up with the limits of soft-tissue shortening. 20 , 21 Bone transport may be more suitable for larger defects but equally comes with a greater potential for complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the potential limitations of the external xation itself, many surgical methods have been applied to decrease the EFI to avoid complications, then receive better clinical results further [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Gupta et al [31] reported a consecutive series of 14 tibial nonunions, which were managed successfully by unilateral external rail xator combined with locking plates for simultaneous xation, with a mean defect size of 6.4 cm, mean external xator index of 21.2 days/cm, and a per-patient complication incidence of 0.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via published articles [6,9,20,22,[45][46][47][48], the application of bone transport in the treatment of infected femoral bone defects is more satisfactory than in the tibia, especially in the grade of bone healing. However, the external xation time, the external xation index of our cohort was higher than the staged bone transport technique, which combined with internal xation or acute shortening and re-lengthening [4,9]. For instance, Sen et al [9] showed a mean EFI of 31.8days/cm in a cohort of 17 patients treated by the modi ed technique of acute shortening and re-lengthening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations