“…Our present procedure requires (1) a diagnosis of definite acute myocardial infarction by WHO criteria (WHO, 1970), (2) definite evidence of acute severe heart failure by clinical and radiological criteria (WHO, 1970), or (if such signs are equivocal) an increase in pulmonary artery pressure above 16 mmHg wedge or 20 mmHg mean, and (3) absent or completely unsatisfactory response to medical treatment over at least a 2-hour period, such treatment to include oxygen by mask, relief of pain, adequate diuretics (the minimum dose of frusemide was 80 mg by intravenous injection), and correction of haemodynamically significant arrhythmias. The MIRU definition of cardiogenic shock (Dunkman et al, 1972;Sanders et al, 1972;O'Rourke et al, 1975) was modified by (a) foregoing the requirement of pulmonary and systemic catheterisation before counterpulsation if clinical signs of cardiac failure were unequivocal and if indirect pressure in the brachial artery was less than 100 mmHg systolic and (b) allowing urine output up to 25 ml/hour with diuretic therapy. All other aspects of the 'MIRU definition' (Dunkman et al, 1972) were retained.…”