2007
DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmm116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute rheumatic fever: an important differential diagnosis of septic arthritis

Abstract: SummaryWe present three cases of suspected septic arthritis in which the joint fluid was sterile. Subsequently all three patients were diagnosed with established moderate-severe rheumatic heart disease. In retrospect it is likely that the earlier presentations were in fact episodes of acute rheumatic fever but were not recognized as such. These cases underline the importance of acute rheumatic fever as a differential diagnosis of septic arthritis when the joint fluid is sterile, particularly in regions where t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this change in epidemiology are not clear. However, our data might underestimate the true incidence of ARF in Fiji because our study focused on inpatient admissions and therefore did not detect outpatient presentations, 13 , 14 or because cases of ARF are not being recognised by health care workers, 15 , 16 or because some cases of ARF are very mild and these patients do not present for medical care 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The reasons for this change in epidemiology are not clear. However, our data might underestimate the true incidence of ARF in Fiji because our study focused on inpatient admissions and therefore did not detect outpatient presentations, 13 , 14 or because cases of ARF are not being recognised by health care workers, 15 , 16 or because some cases of ARF are very mild and these patients do not present for medical care 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[35] The Jones Criteria have been revised and updated several times, and some countries have adapted them for their own circumstances,[836] but there continues to be cases of under- and overdiagnosis, often with tragic consequences. [37] Moreover, there is no intervention currently available that is known to alter the potential for RHD to develop following an episode of ARF. [8] Studies of immunomodulatory agents were largely undertaken several decades ago, or more recently have been relatively small and/or based on a crude understanding of ARF pathogenesis.…”
Section: Challenge 3: Better Understanding Of Disease Pathogenesis Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an inherited susceptibility to ARF, 17 but the basis for this susceptibility has yet to be clarified. 18 We have never sought genetic markers for ARF/RHD using modern techniques.…”
Section: B Genetics Of This Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%