1993
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute respiratory distress syndrome ("ARDS"): no more than a severe acute lung injury?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ARDS continues to be a significant clinical challenge despite all the advances made in the areas of resuscitation and monitoring of shock states [2,3]. This is the result of our inability as clinicians to correct the pathophysiology of ARDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…ARDS continues to be a significant clinical challenge despite all the advances made in the areas of resuscitation and monitoring of shock states [2,3]. This is the result of our inability as clinicians to correct the pathophysiology of ARDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current literature there is very little information regarding corrective approaches for the treatment of ARDS. However, there are many papers on how further iatrogenic injury can be avoided while providing supportive care [2,3,[21][22][23][24]. The first major work on the nondiuretic capacity of furosemide was performed by Ali et al [4 -9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EDITOR, - In their review of the acute respiratory distress syndrome Richard Beale and colleagues maintain that a pulmonary artery occlusion pressure of less than 18 mm Hg is required to allow differentiation between the syndrome and pulmonary oedema secondary to acute heart failure and fluid overload 1. I would caution against using a specific pulmonary artery occlusion pressure to distinguish pulmonary oedema of cardiac origin from that due to increased permeability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%