2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.07.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute psychosocial stress and everyday moral decision-making in young healthy men: The impact of cortisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
51
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
51
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on the previous findings of my master's thesis (Singer et al, 2017), we hypothesized a higher percentage of altruistic decisions after acute stress exposure compared to a non-stress condition. Additionally, in Study II (see Chapter 5), we examined potential effects of social closeness and timing on everyday moral decisionmaking after acute stress exposure (Singer et al, 2020), due to empirical evidence that social distance and timing of the experimental paradigm relative to stressor onset affect the degree of prosocial behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Building on the previous findings of my master's thesis (Singer et al, 2017), we hypothesized a higher percentage of altruistic decisions after acute stress exposure compared to a non-stress condition. Additionally, in Study II (see Chapter 5), we examined potential effects of social closeness and timing on everyday moral decisionmaking after acute stress exposure (Singer et al, 2020), due to empirical evidence that social distance and timing of the experimental paradigm relative to stressor onset affect the degree of prosocial behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Everyday moral dilemmas require decisions between the fulfilment of a moral standard or a social obligation toward another person versus a personal-oriented hedonistic behavior that would explicitly not cause serious bodily harm or legal consequences (Sommer et al, 2010). Typically, the presented response alternatives are altruistic (e.g., helping an old woman who is in distress) versus egoistic (e.g., catching the waiting bus home; further examples can be found in Singer et al, 2017, Sommer et al, 2010, or Starcke et al, 2011. Starcke et al (2011) and Rosen et al (2015) additionally subdivided their scenarios into high-versus low-emotional dilemmas.…”
Section: Everyday Moral Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations