2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute psychosocial stress alters thalamic network centrality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no significant differences between RS 2 and RS 3 : TRS remained significantly lower in RS 3 , and LAS continued its upward trajectory, with significantly greater levels than in RS 1 . These data are in line with studies and showing a relatively slow return of connectivity to baseline levels following acute stress (Reinelt et al, 2019). In agreement with a model proposed by Hermans et al (2014), this time course of change is more similar to the trajectory of cortisol release, which only recovered to baseline at the conclusion of the experiment (T6), than selfreported stress, which was already significantly lower before RS 3 (and comparable to baseline levels) than before RS 2 .…”
Section: Functional Connectivity Does Not Return To Baseline Within 3supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found no significant differences between RS 2 and RS 3 : TRS remained significantly lower in RS 3 , and LAS continued its upward trajectory, with significantly greater levels than in RS 1 . These data are in line with studies and showing a relatively slow return of connectivity to baseline levels following acute stress (Reinelt et al, 2019). In agreement with a model proposed by Hermans et al (2014), this time course of change is more similar to the trajectory of cortisol release, which only recovered to baseline at the conclusion of the experiment (T6), than selfreported stress, which was already significantly lower before RS 3 (and comparable to baseline levels) than before RS 2 .…”
Section: Functional Connectivity Does Not Return To Baseline Within 3supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, changes in TRS correlated with an objective marker of stress (cortisol AUCg) but not with self-report, even though changes in self-reported stress and cortisol output themselves were correlated. Using the TSST, Reinelt et al (2019) reported correlations between change in eigenvector centrality in the thalamus and self-reported stress (and non-significant associations of thalamic centrality with cortisol), suggesting that information about subjective state may be carried in the ascending relay of sensory signals rather than at the cortical level. Further, our data suggest that dynamic functional connectivity in the cortex may contain information about the objective effects of stress that is not consciously accessible to individuals.…”
Section: The Role Of Trait Mindfulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Psychological relaxation was measured using the Affect Grid 40 , which assesses affective state along the two dimensions displeasure/pleasure, and arousal/sleepiness. The instrument has adequate reliability and validity 40 , 41 , and has been used in in different experimental settings, such as longitudinal ecological momentary assessment 42 , or experimental designs 43 45 . The score for each dimension ranges from 1 to 9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we believe that the reason why the study outcomes regarding the correlation between subjective and objective reactivity to stress were inconsistent may be because of the imperfect coupling of different stress reactivity systems (physiology and psychology). For example, when exposed to stressors, the subjective psychological reactivity immediately occurred whereas the stable physiological reactivity occurred far more slowly (Reinelt et al, 2019). Considering the biological stress principle, in stress situations, the glucocorticoids rst in uence the participants' SNS and then the HPA system (Schoofs and Wolf, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%